IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Siddhartha Varma, Nand Prabha Shukla
Asif Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
Nand Prabha Shukla, J.
1. Heard Sri V.P. Srivastava, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Araf Khan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant; Sri Amit Sinha, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and Sri Satish Trivedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the informant.
2. When one Ashraf was killed on 24.09.1997 allegedly at 09:00 AM, a first information report was got lodged on 24.09.1997 by his maternal uncle, Afzal, at Police Station – Simbhawali, Gadhmukhteshwar, District – Ghaziabad.
3. As per the first information report, the incident had taken place at 09:00 AM and the first information report was lodged at 10:15 AM. Upon the lodging of the first information report, investigation commenced and thereafter the accused persons named in the first information report namely Kamal son of Jamaluddin, Kamil and Khursheed sons of Bhure, Naufeel son of Shakur who allegedly were on a jeep and also Afsar and Asif sons of Manjoor who were made accused in the case and were on a motorcycle surrendered on different dates and they were arrested. When the investigation commenced, there were certain statements,





Jodhraj & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan reported in
Vadivelu Thevar vs. The State of Madras reported in AIR 1957 SC 614
Mahendra Singh & Ors. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in
Rajesh Yadav & Anr. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh reported in
Jodhraj & Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan reported in
Basaveni Ravi & Anr. vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in
Witness reliability is crucial in criminal cases; if a witness is deemed unreliable, their testimony cannot support a conviction without corroboration.
Point of Law : When there are eyewitnesses to prove the charge, failure on the part of the prosecution to establish every link in the chain of circumstance would become irrelevant.
The court emphasized the necessity of consistent and reliable eyewitness testimony, finding significant discrepancies that undermined the prosecution's case.
The prosecution failed to prove the charges of murder and unlawful assembly beyond reasonable doubt due to unreliable witness testimonies and lack of corroborative evidence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt with reliable and corroborated evidence.
Conviction for murder by unlawful assembly sustainable on reliable sole eyewitness to killing, corroborated by medical evidence and abduction witnesses, despite FIR delay, witness non-examination, an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt in criminal cases, and the importance of credible and consistent witness testimonies.
Murder – It is for prosecution to connect accused to murder of deceased by producing credible and legally admissible evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.