Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Waqf Madarsa Qasimul Uloom – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff claims ownership of property as waqf. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendants contest ownership based on amendments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court reviews case under waqf act, 1995. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court observes unauthorized constructions on national highway. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed; trial court's order upheld. (Para 25 , 26) |
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
1. The petitioner before this Court had instituted an Original Suit No.9 of 2011 against defendants-respondents No.1 to 3 claiming relief of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining them from demolishing the property in dispute and making new construction over the same.
2. In the plaint, it was averred that plaintiff is the owner and landlord of the property mentioned in the map marked as ‘A’, ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’. It has been let out to defendants No.1 and 2 on a monthly rent of Rs.34/- In para 2 of the plaint, it has been stated that in the aforesaid Madarsa, a Masjid has been constructed where poor children are given basic education and functioning of Madarsa depends upon contribution made. Further in para 3 of the plaint, it is stated that on the said property, a Police Cha
A property claimed as waqf must be registered; unregistered claims do not confer ownership rights, especially when encroaching on public land.
The court affirmed that interested persons in a Waqf can maintain a suit for removal of encroachment, and that expired leases result in automatic classification as encroachers under the Waqf Act.
The court affirmed that interested persons in a Waqf can file for removal of encroachment, and that expired leases render occupants encroachers under the Waqf Act.
A person interested in a Waqf can maintain a suit for removal of encroachment, and an expired lease results in automatic classification as an encroacher under the Waqf Act.
Interested persons can maintain a suit for removal of encroachment under Section 83(2) of the Waqf Act, and those whose lease has expired are considered encroachers.
The court affirmed that interested persons in a Waqf can maintain a suit for removal of encroachment, and that expired leases result in automatic encroachment status under the Waqf Act.
Civil courts retain jurisdiction to determine eviction claims even if waqf status is asserted, unless unequivocally proven as such. Defendants cannot contest landlord's title without substantiating t....
Writ jurisdiction cannot enlarge scope beyond original prayers or adjudicate intricate title disputes over acquired government land; challenges to acquisition or title via statutory remedies like s.3....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
