Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Janhit Madhyamik Vidyalaya – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's institution's eligibility for grant-in-aid. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15) |
| 2. arguments regarding arbitrary denial of grant-in-aid. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. court's analysis of previous decisions affecting the case. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 4. court's observations on discrimination and policy application. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 5. final decision to grant aid to the petitioner. (Para 55 , 56) |
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Aditendra Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Narayan Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 13.10.2018 passed by the respondent no.1-Special Secretary, Basic Education, Government of U.P., Lucknow rejecting the claim of petitioner for taking the institution of petitioner on grant-in-aid.
3. The facts in brief are that there is a Junior High School run under the name of Janhit Madhyamik Vidyalaya Machha, District Kanpur Dehat (hereinafter referred to as ‘instit
The court established that an institution's right to grant-in-aid crystallizes under earlier government orders, and arbitrary denial based on newer policies violates constitutional rights.
when the petitioner-institution had been ousted from the list of selected institutions which was issued on 2.12.2006, then subsequently if the petitioner-institution was eligible, it could not be inc....
The importance of following committee recommendations, principles of natural justice, and equal treatment of institutions in grant-in-aid decisions.
The court emphasized the importance of compliance with grant-in-aid conditions and the violation of principles of natural justice in administrative decisions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the discriminatory refusal of financial approval by the State Government, in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, despite admin....
Ensuring adherence to governmental provisions regarding educational grants is vital for institutional funding.
The Right to free education does not confer entitlement to recurring aid for all private primary schools; compliance with legal requirements is essential for salary claims against the State.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
