IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT, JJ.
M/s Rajan Construction Company - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And Another - Respondents
Writ-C No. 34248 of 2024
Decided On : 18-04-2025
JUDGMENT :
SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
1. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner prays for the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned E-Tender No. ET-60/ MMC/PD/ETPS/HTPS/2024 dated July 10, 2024 as amended on August 13, 2024 issued by Superintending Engineer, Material Management Circle (MMC), Harduaganj Thermal Power Station (HTPS), Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Kasimpur, Aligarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘respondent no.3’) whereby the petitioner was restricted from participating in E-Tender. The petitioner further prays for a direction to respondent no.3 to invite a fresh tender for the supply of agro-based non-torrefied biomass pellets for coal handling plant at the aforementioned location and to permit the petitioner to participate in the tender process without imposing any pre-qualifying condition as mentioned in Clause 3(i) of the impugned E-Tender.
FACTS
2. The factual matrix of the present writ petition is delineated below:
a. The petitioner is a firm registered at District Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, engaged in small-scale business of supplying non-torrefied biomass pellets for coal handling plants.
b. On November 17, 2017 the Ministry of Power published a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) regarding biomass utilization for power generation through co-firing in coal-based power plants. This was followed by an advisory dated November 24, 2017 wherein all State Power Secretaries, Thermal Power Generating Plants/ Utilities (Public or Private) along with the Managing Director of Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as ‘respondent no.2’) were directed to utilize biomass pellets to the extent of 5-10%.
c. Subsequently, the said advisory was revised on October 8, 2021 further emphasizing biomass utilization for power generation through co-firing in coal based power plants.
d. On March 2, 2022 the Ministry of Power issued a Model Contract for the use of biomass in Thermal Power Plants (TPPs) which was later revised on January 6, 2023.
e. Clause 2(b) of the aforementioned Model Contract provides that the power stations situated within 300 km of National Capital Region (NCR) must use a minimum 50% raw materials consisting of stubble/straw/crop residue from rice paddy sourced exclusively from Punjab, Haryana or NCR region.
f. On July 11, 2023, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change notified the Environment (Utilisation of Crop residue by Thermal Power Plants) Rules, 2023 which are applicable to the NCR region. These rules mandate that all coal-based thermal power plants must utilize a minimum five percent blend of pellets or briquettes made from crop residue along with coal.
g. On July 10, 2024, respondent no.3 under the control of the Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. floated an E-Tender (No. ET-60/MMC/PD/ETPS/HTPS/2024), inviting bids for the supply of non-torrefied biomass pellets, a renewable fuel source promoted by the Central Government to reduce pollution and encourage cleaner energy in thermal power plants and the said E-Tender was amended on August 13, 2024.
h. However, the tender documents contained a restrictive Clause 3(i) as a pre-qualifying condition, which mandated that only existing manufacturers in the NCR region or those whose manufacturing plants are located within 100 km from the Truck Gate (Material Entry Gate), Harduaganj Thermal Power Station, Kasimpur, Aligarh are eligible to participate in the tender. Bidders were required to confirm compliance with this condition in Part-I, that is, technical bid of the tender.
i. The technical bids wherein the confirmation of the impugned restrictive clause was mandatory were opened on September 12, 2024.
j. Subsequently, on October 8, 2024, Ministry of Power, Government of India, has issued a notification concerning significant shortfall in biomass co-firing monthly targets, wherein immediate action was requ
Engineering Kamgar Union v. Electro Steels Castings Ltd.
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Reliance Energy Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corpn. Ltd.
Silppi Constructions Contractors v. Union of India
Reliance Energy Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Road Development Corpn. Ltd.
AI
The court ruled that restrictions in E-Tendering based on geographical location are justifiable in the interest of public health and environmental protection, affirming the limited scope of judicial ....
The formulation of tender conditions falls within the administrative domain of the authority, and judicial review is limited to preventing arbitrariness or favoritism. The courts cannot interfere wit....
Judicial review of tender conditions is limited; courts should not interfere unless actions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or mala fide, ensuring public interest is prioritized.
Judicial review in tender matters is limited; courts should not interfere unless actions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or biased.
Point of law: powers of judicial review are limited and while exercising such power the Court has to see whether the process adopted or decision made by the authority is malafideor is intended to fav....
Judicial review of tender conditions is restricted to cases of arbitrariness or unreasonableness, reinforcing that the authority determining eligibility criteria has the discretion and expertise in c....
The court affirmed that stringent eligibility criteria in public tender processes cannot violate statutory relaxations for Start-ups, emphasizing limited grounds for judicial review.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.