IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
J.J. MUNIR, J.
Ram Sundar Pal - Petitioner
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Writ A. No. 7119 of 2023
Decided On : 08-04-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and selection process for police constable. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. previous writ petitions and orders regarding the petitioner's appointment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. pending criminal cases and their implications on employment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's procedural considerations and timeline of hearings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. analysis of the petitioner's affidavit and knowledge of pending cases. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. legal principles regarding suppression of information in employment applications. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. court's evaluation of the nature of the alleged crimes. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. inquiry into the legitimacy of the goondas act case against the petitioner. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 9. government orders on character verification and their implications. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 10. judicial precedents on handling cases of suppressed criminal history. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 11. court's final observations on the superintendent of police's decision-making. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 12. final judgment and orders regarding the petitioner's appointment. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT :
(J.J. Munir, J.)
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Superintendent of Police, Hathras dated 19.03.2023, cancelling his candidature for appointment as a Police Constable, a post for which he was selected after a recruitment held in accordance with rules, pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow. The petitioner has also sought consequential reliefs.
2. The Chairman, Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow, published an advertisement for recruitment of Police and PAC Constables on their website, called PRPB-1 (82)/15. The petitioner applied for the post of Police and PAC Constable (Male) in the direct recruitment of the year 2015, for which, he says, he was eligible. It would be utterly unnecessary to mention details of the petitioner’s candidature for those are not in dispute or issue. The petitioner was selected and his name appeared in the merit list. He was issued a provisional admit card to appear in the physical efficiency test, scheduled to be held on 05.05.2016. He appeared in the physical efficiency test and declared successful. The petitioner was then called for character verification, medical examination and the verification of his Classes X and XII mark-sheets. He was directed to appear for the purpose on 14.06.2018 at the Police Lines, Etawah in the morning hours at 8 O’ clock. The petitioner’s candidature was accepted during the said verification and medical test. The selection being complete, the petitioner, along with other selected candidates, was allotted his district of posting. The petitioner was allotted District Hathras for his posting. Despite being allotted a district, the petitioner was not issued with an appointment letter. When the petitioner approached the Senior Superintendent of Police, Etawah, he was informed that his appointment had been withheld due to a criminal case pending against him, to wit, Case Crime No.564 of 2015, under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ‘the SC/ST Act’), Police Station Jaswant Nagar, District Etawah.
3. It is the petitioner’s case that not only was he falsely implicated in the crime, but it was not within his knowledge that the case was pending against him. He was never arrested or summoned by the Police in connection with the crime, that was based on an incident dated 17.12.2015. The petitioner was served with a notice by the Police to appear in Court for the first time on 16.03.2016. This notice was issued by the Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Etawah and required his presence on 17.03.2016 at 10.30 a.m. at the time of submission of the charge-sheet. The petitioner was tried vide Sessions Trial No.2




Avtar Singh v. Union of Indian and others
Pawan Kumar v. Union of India and another
Shivam Yadav v. State of U.P. and others
The suppression of a pending criminal case does not automatically disqualify a candidate; the nature of the offence and the candidate's overall character must be considered in recruitment decisions.
The cancellation of a candidate's selection based solely on the registration of a criminal case, without evidence of complicity, is unjustified and reflects a lack of proper consideration of the fact....
Character verification for public service must consider the nature of past allegations and acquittals, rejecting mechanical disqualification based solely on prior criminal cases.
Non-disclosure of a trivial criminal case does not automatically disqualify a candidate for government service; the appointing authority must consider the nature of the case and the candidate's overa....
Non-disclosure of minor criminal involvement does not automatically disqualify a candidate; suitability must be assessed holistically by the appointing authority.
Suppression of material information in employment forms can justify cancellation of candidature, and subsequent acquittal may not warrant consideration for selection/appointment, especially in cases ....
Mere pendency of a criminal case does not disqualify a candidate for public service if the allegations are trivial and disclosed during the application process.
The court held that the non-disclosure of a past criminal case requires careful evaluation of circumstances, and automatic cancellation of appointment is arbitrary.
Non-disclosure of trivial criminal cases does not disqualify a candidate for government service; the appointing authority must consider the nature of the case and the candidate's overall suitability.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.