SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2427

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Raj Beer Singh,J.
Asha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ankur Jaiswal, Sangam Singh
For the Respondent: Ashutosh Tiwari

JUDGMENT :

Raj Beer Singh, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred against the order dated 14.05.2024, passed by learned A.C.J.M., Court No.10, Azamgarh, in Complaint Case No. 11 of 2022 (Sarita Devi Vs. Asha Devi), under Section 420 I.P.C., Police Station- Deogaon, District- Azamgarh, whereby the application filed by the applicant seeking discharge has been rejected.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that impugned order is against facts and law and thus liable to be set aside. It is a complaint case and in complaint case application for discharge filed on behalf of accused has to be decided under Section 245 Cr.P.C., whereas the learned trial court has decided the discharge application of the applicant under Section 239 Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that the dispute between the parties is purely civil in nature and no prima-facie case under Section 420 IPC is made out and that applicant was liable to be discharged but learned Magistrate has not considered facts and law in correct perspective and committed error by rejecting that application under Secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top