Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
Ram Lal (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Laxmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final decision: injunction set aside. (Para 1 , 19) |
| 2. second appeal admitted on substantial question of law. (Para 2) |
| 3. the appeal is based on a substantial question of law regarding injunction and possession. (Para 3) |
| 4. parties disagree on possession and injunction validity. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 5. court's analysis of possession and injunction validity. (Para 7 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 6. suit details and preceding decisions outlined. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 7. legal standards for permanent injunction elucidated. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajnish Kumar, J.
1. Heard, Shri Bahar Ali, learned counsel for the appellants and Ms.Tapasya Bajpai along with Shri Amarendra Kumar Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. None appeared on behalf of respondent no.2.
2. This second appeal under Section 100 of CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE (here-in-after referred as CPC ) has been filed for setting-aside the judgment and decree dated 14.10.2021/26.10.2021 passed in Civil Appeal No.60 of 2013 (Smt. Vijay Laxmi Vs. Ram Lal (Dead) substituted by his legal heirs) by Additional District Judge, Court no.6, Sitapur.
3. The appeal has been admitted on the following substantial question of law:-
"1
A plaintiff in a permanent injunction suit must prove lawful possession of the property and the defendant's interference, especially when the disputed property is unidentifiable.
The plaintiff, having lost the case on title dispute, was not entitled to permanent injunction against the true owner.
(1) Injunction is a consequential relief – In a suit for declaration with a consequential relief of injunction, it is not a suit for declaration simpliciter, it is a suit for declaration with a furth....
A permanent injunction cannot be granted against co-owners without establishing clear possession or valid title, especially when title is disputed.
A suit for permanent injunction requires valid title; without adherence to statutory requirements for land transactions, such claims are unsustainable.
Ownership transfers upon registration of a sale deed, and non-payment of part of the consideration does not invalidate the sale; the transferor's remedy lies in recovery, not cancellation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
