Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AJIT KUMAR
Sandhya Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ajit Kumar, J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri S.P. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the contesting respondent U.P. Public Service Commission and Sri Vishal Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that U.P. Public Service Commission issued an advertisement on 14th July, 2014 bearing advertisement No. A-2/E-1/2014 inviting application on the post of Food Safety Officer prescribing certain qualifications for a candidate to apply against the same.
3. The petitioner appeared in the written examination held by Public Service Commission and for having passed out successfully in the written examination she was issued with call letter dated 5.12.2014 for the interview scheduled on 19.12.2014. However, when the petitioner approached the Commission to participate in the interview, she was not permitted to participate. Final results came to be declared on 29th January, 2015 and the petitioner’s candidature having been rejected, she filed petition before this Court on 28th January, 2015 itself. The grievance of the petitioner is that she possess
A Bachelor in Physiotherapy is not equivalent to a Bachelor in Medicine as required under the Service Rules, as determined by the Medical Council of India.
(1) Appointment as Food Safety Officers – Candidates who possessed post-graduate degrees in subjects covered under Clause 2.1.3 of FSS Rules, are qualified for post of FSO – FSS Act does not permit S....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
