Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Urmila Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to pension refusal based on application details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding the petitioner’s entitlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. legal definitions and implications of family pension. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. recognition of family pension as a statutory right. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 19) |
| 5. court's ruling based on the legal status as wife. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. final decision to grant family pension. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging an order dated 21.09.2020 passed by respondent no. 3 – Finance and Accounts Officer, Basic Education, Mirzapur, vide which the claim of the petitioner for payment of family pension has been rejected.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner’s husband was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in a Basic School run by Basic Shiksha Parishad and was superannuated on 31.03.2016, after which he was getting pension. He passed away on 29.11.2019, therefore, his wife (petitioner herein) became entitled for family pension. The petitioner (wife) moved an application requesting for sanction of family pension. However, her claim o
Family pension is a statutory entitlement of the legally wedded spouse and cannot be revoked by the employee's unilateral actions, as affirmed by the court.
Under the Gujarat Pension Rules, the legally wedded wife of a male government employee is entitled to family pension despite any erroneous nomination by the employee prioritizing someone else.
Pension benefits cannot be adjudicated through writ jurisdiction in the presence of competing marriage claims; a definitive legal spouse must be established in civil court settings.
The nominee's entitlement to family pension is upheld, but disputes regarding marital status must be resolved in civil court.
The validity of a marriage under the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules and Section 5(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and its impact on entitlement to family pension.
Unchallenged civil court declaration of legal wedlock binds employer-participant via estoppel and res judicata for family pension, overriding non-notification under pension rules.
Disputes over family pension nominee status must be adjudicated in civil court, not through writ petitions.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
