SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3039

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
RAJNISH KUMAR, J. 
Devendra Singh And Others – Appellant 
Versus
State – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 19 of 1993
Decided on : 19-08-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.H. Ibrahim, Amarendra Kr. Bajpai, Divesh Mishra, IK Mishra, I.P. Singh, K.K.Tewari, Kaushlendra Tiwari, Ratnesh Agnihotri, Rishad Murtaza, S K Shukla, Sachidanand Mishra, Shri Prakash Pandey
For the Respondent:Govt. Advocate, Aniruddh Singh

For conviction under dacoity, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt with corroborative evidence; mere identity of accused is insufficient without direct involvement in the crime.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 395 and 397 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Conviction of accused for dacoity and rioting - The trial court's findings relied heavily on the statement of identified witnesses and available medical evidence of injuries - The defense highlighted contradictions in witness statements and absence of material evidence linking accused to the property stolen. (Paras 1-34)

(B) Prosecution's burden - The prosecution must prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt; merely lodging an FIR does not constitute proof of offense - Independent corroborative evidence is crucial, particularly in cases involving known assailants. (Paras 23-26)

(C) Legal Interpretation - The Supreme Court’s emphasis on the need for direct involvement or use of deadly weapon to sustain charges under Section 397 IPC; accessory liability is not applicable without proof of use. (Paras 30-34)

JUDGMENT :

Rajnish Kumar, J.

1. Heard Sri I. K. Mishra and Sri Sachidanand Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant nos. 1 and 3 respectively and Shri Rajesh Kumar Shukla, learned Additional Government Advocate (here-in-after referred as AGA).

2. This appeal has been filed by the appellants namely Devendra Singh, Sripal Singh, Suresh Singh, Dinesh Singh and Yogendra Singh. During pendency of this appeal, Shripal Singh, Dinesh Singh and Yogendra Singh have died, therefore, this appeal has abated on their behalf on different dates. Now this appeal survives only on behalf of the appellant no. 1-Devendra Singh son of Indrapal Singh and appellant no. 3-Suresh Singh son of Hari Bux Singh.

3. This Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) of Code of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (here-in-after referred as CrPC) has been filed assailing the judgment and order dated 7/11-1-1993 passed in S.T. No. 387 of 1991; State Versus Devendra Singh and 4 Others, arising out of Case Crime No. 66/1990 under Sections 395 /397 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE (here-in-after referred as IPC), Police Station Behtagokul, District Hardoi by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Hardoi, by means of which the appellant nos. 1 and 5 namely, Devendra Singh and Yogendra Singh have been convicted under Section 395 IPC and sentenced each of them to 10 years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000, and in default of payment of fine, three years simple imprisonment and seven years rigorous imprisonment under Section 397 IPC and both the sentences have to run concurrently. The remaining appellant nos. 2, 3 and 4, namely Shripal Singh, Suresh Singh, and Dinesh Singh respectively have been convicted under Section 395 IPC and sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment to each of them and a fine of 10,000 and in default of payment of fine, three years simple imprisonment.

4. Prosecution story, in brief, is that complainant-Ganga Bux Singh submitted written-report Ext.Ka.1 at Police Station Behta Gokul, District Hardoi, with the allegations that there is enmity between him and Sripal Singh, Suresh Singh, Dinesh Singh and Devendra Singh of his village in connection with the land since long and a case is also pending in the Tehsil and so many times hot words have been exchanged in this regard. About a year ago his sons were also beaten, in regard to which, he gave an application to police and a day before the occurrence at about 6 P.M. Devendra Singh threatened his son-Hari Nam Singh in the grove near the village situated in the north and threatened to see him. In the last night at about 1.30 A.M., while he was sleeping at his door along with his brother-in-law Ranvir Singh and his sons Harinam Singh, Hari Shanker Singh along with their wives Savitri and Shiv Kumari were sleeping inside the house, on noise, he woke up and saw that a person flashed torch on his face. He also after flashing his torch saw that Devendra Singh, Sripal Singh, Suresh, Dinesh, Yogendra Singh and four other persons, who can be identified, were standing near him, out of them Devendra Singh was armed with single barrel gun, Yogendra was armed with 'Tamancha' and remaining were armed with 'Lathi-Danda''. Devendra kept his gun on his chest and asked him "SALE UTH KER GHAR KA DARWAJA KHULWAO TUMHARE GUNDE LARKON KO JAAN SE KHATM KER DOONGA". Sripal Singh gave him 3-4 slaps. Suresh moved 'Danda'. Due to fear, he got opened the door of the house. It has further been alleged that inside the house a lantern was illuminating on the wall of kitchen. They, on being entered the house, began 'Maarpeet'. All of them used fists and kicks and beat his both the sons with 'Danda' also. Devendra Singh challenged and said "INKO ITNA MARO KI JHAGRA MITA DO". They had beaten his daughters-in-law also and Suresh, Dinesh and Yogendra tried to commit rape with them and tried to enter barrel of gun in their vagina. They also opened fire in the air. On the noise, Deva Singh, Om Prakash, Nand Kishore and several others reached on the spot. In the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top