SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2431

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ashutosh Srivastava
Yogesh Kumar Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Siddhartha Srivastava
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Ashutosh Srivastava, J.

1.This is a Bail Cancellation Application seeking the cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party No. 2, namely, Kuna Kapoor son of Vinod Kapoor by the Sessions Court vide order dated 23.12.2022.

2. The learned Sessions Court, Ghaziabad while granting bail to the opposite party No. 2 imposed a condition that the opposite party would pay a sum of Rs.42 lacs out of the outstanding amount of Rs.4 crores and 37 lacs to the applicant/first informant within two months.

3. The bail cancellation was sought by the applicant herein by moving a bail cancellation application before the Sessions Court, Ghaziabad on the ground that the conditions imposed by the Court of Sessions for grant of bail had not been complied with inasmuch as the amount of Rs.42 lacs as undertaken by the opposite party No. 2 to be deposited had not been deposited and only a sum of Rs.4 lacs was deposited that too during the pendency of the bail cancellation application.

4. The leaned Sessions Court vide order dated 10.9.2024 rejected the bail cancellation application placing reliance upon the various decisions of the Apex Court.

5. The applicant/first informant had approached this Cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top