SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2534

NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Manoj Kumar Yadav
For the Respondent: Rajendra Babu Gaur

Table of Content
1. transfer application filed under section 407 cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2)
2. opposition to the transfer application by respondents. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's skepticism toward transfer application. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. judicial integrity and public perception. (Para 8 , 9)
5. tests for reasonable apprehension in transfer petitions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
6. transfer application rejected. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT :

Nalin Kumar Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Shri Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Rajendra Babu Gaur, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and the learned AGA for the State.

2. This is an application filed under Section 407 Cr.P.C. seeking transfer of the proceedings of Session Trial No. 351 of 2015, arising out of case crime no. 256 of 2014, under Sections 307 , 504, 506 IPC, Police Station-Hasayan, District-Hathras pending in the Court of Additional District and Sessions Judge-Ist Hathras to any other competent Court in the same district.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that on 18.7.2024 when the applicant/informant came to the Court at Hathras for pairvi of his case he saw the accused/opposite party nos. 2 and 3 coming ou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top