SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2538

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
Jitendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sushil Kumar

Table of Content
1. bail application filed for enlargement (Para 1 , 2)
2. manipulation found in affidavit regarding bail (Para 3 , 4)
3. court observations on the integrity of disclosures in legal proceedings (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. bail application rejected due to fraudulent conduct (Para 8)
5. notification of the order to relevant parties (Para 9)

JUDGMENT :

Ashutosh Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Shri Gyanendra Kumar, learned counsel, under the authority of Shri Sushil Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri S.K. Rai, learned A.G.A. Ist, for the State and perused the record.

2. This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, Jitendra Kumar, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 285 of 2024, under Sections-420 and 409 I.P.C. Police Station-Seepari Bazar, District-Jhansi.

3. Shri S.K. Rai, learned A.G.A.-Ist, at the very outset submits that there is a manipulation in paragraph no. 4 of an affidavit, annexed as Annexure no. 9 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application, moved before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Jhansi as in original copy of the said affidavit, only it is mentioned as

has an intention to obtain bail by p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top