SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 3682

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANDEEP JAIN
Anchal Jai – Appellant
Versus
Sahkari Ganna Union – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ashish Gupta, Sanjay Singh, Shantanu, Siddharth
For the Respondents: Aditya Singh Parihar

GUDGMENT :

SANDEEP JAIN, J.

1. The instant appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for enhancement of compensation has been preferred by the claimant against the impugned judgment and award dated 13.11.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, E.C. Act Meerut in MACP No. 642 of 2009 (Km. Anchal Jain vs. Sahkari Ganna Union Mawana,Meerut and others), whereby, for the injuries sustained by the claimant in a road accident which occurred on 29.12.2008, a compensation of Rs. 10,83,950/- along with interest at the rate of 7% per annum has been awarded to the claimant, which has been ordered to beindemnified by the insurer of the offending Bolero No.UP15-AF-3348.

2. Since there is no cross appeal by the owner, driver and the insurer of the offending vehicle as such, the factum of accident and negligence ofthe offending driver is not disputed by the respondents.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant-claimant submitted that the claimant was travelling as a pillion rider on Scooty No.UP-15-AF-4501 at the time of the accident and was returning home from her school i.e. Sofia Girls School, Meerut then the scooty was hit by the offending Bolero N

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top