HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
J.J. MUNIR, SANJIV KUMAR, JJ.
Arbind Singh and Another – Appellants
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1992 of 1984
Decided On : 19-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal by convicts against conviction and sentencing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of incident and fir lodged. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. testimonies of eyewitnesses regarding the murder. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. expert testimony on cause of death. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. defense arguments challenging prosecution. (Para 19 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. trial court's conviction analysis and findings. (Para 21 , 27 , 30) |
| 7. discussion on motive and reliability of eyewitnesses. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. conclusion on acquittal of appellant due to insufficient evidence. (Para 53 , 54 , 56) |
| 9. final orders and procedural directives following judgment. (Para 57 , 58 , 59) |
JUDGMENT :
Sanjiv Kumar, J.
1. The instant Criminal Appeal has been preferred by the appellants/ convicts Arbind Singh son of Bishwanath Singh and Bhola Nath Dubey son of Deo Narain Dubey, both residents of Village-Bhaiswar, Police Station-Ghorawal, District- Mirzapur, against the judgment and order dated 20.07.1984 passed by the Additional Sessions, Judge, Mirzapur in Session Trial No. 101 of 1983, State Vs. Arbind Singh and Another .
2. By the impugned judgment and order, the learned Trial Judge has convicted and sentenced the appellant Bhola Nath Dubey to undergo imprisonment for life, finding him guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and the appellant Arbind Singh to imprisonment for life for offence punishable under .
3. The present Criminal Appeal in regard to accused appellant no. 2 Bhola Nath Dubey son of Deo Narain has abated, by an order of the Court dated 22nd August, 2025. Therefore, the present Criminal Appeal now proceeds on behalf of appellant No. 1/convict, Arbind Singh, only.
4. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that the informant Ram Murat son of Bihari Singh, resident of Village- Bhaiswar, Police Station- Ghorawal, District- Mirzapur submitted a written information (tehrir) dated 15.09.1982 (Ext. Ka-2) before Incharge, Police Station- Ghorawal, District- Mirzapur, stating therein that on 14/15.09.1982 at about 12 midnight the informant’s father Bihari Singh son of Jhuri Singh, aged about 60 years, was sleeping on a cot in the living room (Baithka) situate towards northern side of his house. On the other cots, two in number, the informant, his cousin Shiv Murat (fufera bhai), and Gauri Shankar, were sleeping. Upon hearing (aahat) some one’s footsteps the informant got up. He woke up Shiv Murat and Gauri Shankar. Four miscreants came near the door of the Baithka. The informant flashed his torch to spot them. One of the miscreants shot at his father, leading the informant to raise alarm. The miscreants made good then escape as were chased. Meanwhile, Ram Surat son of Lalji a resident of the adjacent house, came out of (his house) with his torch. The miscreants were chased across some distance but they fled away towards the south. One of the miscreants was identified as Arbind Singh son of Biswanath Singh and other was Bhola Pandit both residents of Village- Bhaiswar, Police Station- Ghorawal. He had identified the rest of the two miscreants, by face. When they returned to the living room (Baithka), the informant found his father lying dead on the cot.
5. Upon this information a chik FIR (Ext. Ka-16) under Section 302 IPC , bearing Case Crime No. 51 of 1982, was lodged at police station Ghorawal, District Mirzapur, against accused Arbind Singh, Bhola Pandit and two unknown men. The investigation of the case was entrusted to Station Officer of the Police Station, Diwakar Mishra. The inquest report was prepared alongwith connected papers. The post- mortem examination of the deceased was done, whereupon it was found that the deceased had sustained firearm injures and the cause of death was opined as shock and hemorrhage as a result of the ante-mortem injuries. The investigating officer inspected the torch and prepared its supurdaginama marked (Ext. Ka-4). He prepared a fard baramadgi of one lungi, found after a few days towa
Thulia Kali Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Mohd. Muslim Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (now Uttrakhand)
Meharaj Singh (L/Nk.) v. State of U.P.
The court emphasized the prosecution's burden to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the accused due to substantial doubts regarding the credibility of witness testimo....
Reliable eye-witness testimony of natural witnesses, consistent with medical evidence and prompt FIR, sustains murder conviction under 302/34 IPC despite alleged enmity.
Offence of Murder - Conviction set aside - No one actually witnessed incident and FIR was lodged on basis of guess-work and suspicion and appellants have been implicated on account of suspicion becau....
Murder – Presence of rigor mortis by itself cannot be decisive of time of death – Appellant is entitled to benefit of doubt.
The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to significant inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.