SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SATYA VEER SINGH
Brijesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Binod Kumar Yadav, Raj Nath Bhakta
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT :

SATYA VEER SINGH, J.

1. Heard Mr Raj Nath Bhakta, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Subhendra Singh along with Mr B.P. Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 16.10.2025 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 22, Azamgarh, in Misc. Case No. 3817 of 2024 (Anand Kumar vs. Brajesh Kumar), under Section 138 The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred as N.I. Act), Police Station Kotwali, District Azamgarh. It is further prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Misc. Case No. 3817 of 2024 (Anand Kumar vs. Brijesh Kumar), under Section 138 N. I Act, Police Station - Kotwali, District - Azamgarh, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Court No.22, Azamgarh, during pendency of the present application, otherwise applicant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the application dated 08.09.2025 has been rejected by the impugned order dated 16.10.2025. It is further submitted that the impugned orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top