SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Akansha Saxena – Appellant
Versus
Shikhar Saxena – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Madhav Jain
For the Respondent: Mahesh Narain Singh

JUDGMENT :

YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

1. Heard Sri Madhav Jain, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mahesh Narain Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party.

2. The present transfer application has been filed by the applicant–wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Matrimonial Petition No. 2130 of 2023, instituted by the opposite party under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, pending before the Court of Additional Family Court No. 5, Ghaziabad, to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Agra.

3. Though the lis arises out of a matrimonial dispute between private parties, the issues which arise for consideration transcend the individual facts of the case and touch upon the nature, scope, and contours of the jurisdiction exercised by this Court under Section 24 CPC, particularly in cases where transfer is sought by consent or where the opposite party does not oppose the prayer. The matter, therefore, calls for a consideration of the applicable legal principles governing exercise of powers of transfer under Section 24, on the basis of consent of parties.

4. The factual position brought on record indicates that the marriage between

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top