SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 82

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANDEEP JAIN
Zaibunisha – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Birendra Kumar

Table of Content
1. appeal filed against rejection of injunction suit. (Para 1 , 9 , 10)
2. plaintiff's claim based on unregistered agreement. (Para 2)
3. legal insights on effect of unregistered agreements. (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. unregistered agreements are inadmissible for specific performance. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 11 , 12)
5. appeal dismissed; trial court’s judgment affirmed. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP JAIN, J.

1. The instant appeal has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 96 C.P.C. against the impugned judgment and decree dated 09.10.2025 passed by J.S.C.C./Civil Judge (S.D.), Saharanpur in O.S. No.108 of 2025 (Old Original Suit No.1330 of 2024) (Smt. Zaibunisha vs. Sanjeev Kumar) whereby the plaintiff's suit for the relief of permanent injunction for restraining the defendant from interfering in her peaceful possession and encroachment of the disputed property and for restraining the defendant from alienating or transferring it, has been rejected.

2. Learned counsel for the plaintiff-appellant submitted that it was agreed upon between the plaintiff and defendant by agreement dated 16.01.2020 that the disputed property would be sold for a consideration of Rs.65

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top