IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANDEEP JAIN
Jyoti – Appellant
Versus
Neha Khatri – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP JAIN, J.
1. The instant appeal has been filed by the claimants for enhancement of compensation under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the impugned judgment and award dated 30.7.2011 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No. 7, Muzaffarnagar in MACP No. 74 of 2010 ( Smt. Jyoti and others Vs. Neha Khatri and others ), whereby for the untimely death of Sachin Kumar on 30.12.2009 due to injuries suffered in a motor accident that occurred on 23.12.2009, a compensation of Rs.14,74,445/- along with interest @ 6% per annum has been awarded to the claimants, 80% of which has been ordered to be indemnified by the insurer of offending Car No. UA 07 G 1313.
2. Since no cross appeal has been preferred by the owner, driver, and insurer of the offending car, the factum of accident and negligence of the offending driver is not disputed by the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the claimants-appellants submitted that Sachin Kumar (deceased) was driving his motorcycle number UP-11-S-2228 cautiously on his side of the road, which was hit by the offending Car No.UA-07-G-1313, which was being driven rashly and negligently, whic
Vimal Kanwar and others Vs. Kishore Dan and others
Jiju Kuruvila & Ors. vs. Kunjujamma Mohan & Ors.
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Indira Srivastava & Ors.
Shyamwati Sharma & Ors. vs. Karam Singh & Ors.
Manasvi Jain Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.
Magma General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & others
Rahul Ganpatrao Sable vs Laxman Maruti Jadhav (Dead) through LRs. and Others
Sebastiani Lakra and others vs. National Insurance Company Limited and another
The court reinforced that all allowances must be included in calculating income for compensation, and compassionate appointments should not affect future earnings claims under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must consider gross income without arbitrary deductions and allow future prospects based on statutory guidelines, ensuring just compensation for victims' dep....
Compensation for wrongful death under the Motor Vehicles Act must not deduct pension or insurance benefits; claimants are also entitled to future prospects enhancement regardless of the deceased's ag....
An employee dies in harness even in normal course, due to illness and to maintain the family of the deceased one of the dependents may be entitled for compassionate appointment but that cannot be ter....
Compensation assessments in fatal accident claims must account for actual dependency, future prospects, and appropriate multipliers, following statutory guidelines and relevant precedents.
Point of Law : Motor Vehicle - Accident - seeking enhancement of the award amount - Liability of insurance company - since the Insurance Appeal was mostly involving an attempt to reduce the compensat....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the determination of just and reasonable compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the deceased's income, future prospects, loss....
Compensation for vehicular accidents must be just and reasonable, focusing on equitable loss recovery, while applying correct legal principles without succumbing to strict technicalities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the Court's duty to award just compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, taking into account recent legal developments and the power of the Court ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.