Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
GAUTAM CHOWDHARY
Monika – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for anticipatory bail details (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. opposition to anticipatory bail application (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. considerations for granting anticipatory bail (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. granting anticipatory bail with conditions (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM CHOWDHARY, J.
1. Heard Shri Gaurav Kakkar, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri Raghvendra Prakash, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Chandan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Babloo Pant, learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record.
2. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime no. 472 of 2023, under Sections 316 , 420, 504, 120-B I.P.C. and Section 15(2), 15(3) of MEDICAL COUNCIL ACT , 1956, Police Station Kiratpur, District Bijnor, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on anticipatory bail.
3. At the very outset learned counsel for the informant submits that non bailable warrant as well as proclamation under Sections 82 & 83 Cr.P.C. have been issued against the applicant earlier, therefore, there is no occasion to entertain the present anticipatory bail application and the same deserves to be
The court determined that substantial personal circumstances affecting the applicant's court appearances can warrant the granting of anticipatory bail despite the issuance of prior non-bailable warra....
Grant of Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. based on the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced at the bar.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
