IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Petitioners, in present bunch of writ petitions, have participated in a recruitment process initiated in pursuance of Advertisement No. 51 of year 2022 to fill up 910 posts of Assistant Professors in different aided non-Government Post Graduate Colleges.
2. U.P. Education Service Selection Commission issued a schedule for written examination which was held on 16th / 17th April, 2025 in two shifts at 52 different Examination Centers in six Districts for 33 different Subjects.
3. Immediately after the written examinations, two First Information Reports, being FIR No. 0144 dated 20.04.2025 and FIR No. 0181 dated 21.04.2025, were lodged at Police Stations Vibhuti Khand, Lucknow East and Chinhat, Lucknow East, against four persons, alleging that accused were involved in providing question papers of written examination to the participants after taking huge money.
4. In pursuance of above First Information Reports, investigation was commenced and at highest level of State such irregularities were taken note of, as to whether continue with examination process or not. A decision was taken to commence evaluation process vide a notification dated 24.07.202


Lila Dhar vs. State of Rajasthan and others
Tanvi Sarwal vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and others
State of Himachal Pradesh and others vs. Raj Kumar and others
State of West Bengal vs. Baishakhi Bhattacharyya (Chatterjee) and others
Sachin Kumar and Others v. Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (DSSSB) and Others
Bihar School Examination Board v. Subhas Chandra Sinha and Others
Board of High School and Intermediate Education, U.P., Allahabad v. Ghanshyam Das Gupta and Others
Anamica Mishra and Others v. U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad and Others
Madhyamic Shiksha Mandal, M.P. v. Abhilash Shiksha Prasar Samiti and Others
Union of India and Others v. Rajesh P.U., Puthuvalnikathu and Another
Inderpreet Singh Kahlon and Others v. State of Punjab and Others
Joginder Pal and Others v. State of Punjab and Others
Chairman, All India Railways Recruitment Board and Another v. K. Shyam Kumar and Others
State of Tamil Nadu and Another v. A. Kalaimani and Others
Gohil Vishvaraj Hanubhai and Others v. State of Gujarat and Others
Employees State Insurance Corporation and another vs. Dr. Vinay Kumar and others
A candidate's right to selection cannot override the necessity for a fair examination process; substantial evidence of systemic irregularity justifies cancellation of examination results.
An examination can only be cancelled if there are systemic irregularities; isolated incidents do not justify re-examination if tainted candidates can be segregated from untainted ones.
Cancellation of public examinations must be justified by systemic irregularities; isolated issues like double admit cards do not warrant such drastic measures.
(1) Constitutional values which undergird Articles 14 and 16 mandate that selection processes conducted by public authorities to make recruitments have to be fair, transparent and accountable.(2) Whe....
The court emphasized that the integrity of public employment selections must be maintained, ruling that the failure to publish the master answer key and deletion of original data rendered the selecti....
(1) Appointment – Cancellation of entire selection due to mass irregularities is justified.(2) Principles of Natural Justice cannot be invoked to validate fraud that has occurred – These principles a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.