SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 430

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI
Hasina Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Akshaya Kumar, Jaideep Pandey
For the Respondent: Mahtab Alam

JUDGMENT :

PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.

1. Heard Sri Jaideep Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mahtab Alam and Sri R.K. Shukla, learned counsel for O.P. No.2 and Sri Shashidhar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for the relief mentioned in the prayer clause of the application. The relief sought in the application is delineated below:

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this application and to quash the order dated 23.01.2023 passed by Ld. Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. (Crime against women), Moradabad in Execution Case No. 697 of 2022 Smt. Hasina Khatoon Vs. Ahmad @ Ramzani, under Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act-2005, arising out of Case No. 10095 of 2017, Hasina Khatoon Vs. Ahmad Ali , under Section 12 of Domestic Violence Act, by which the courts below partly rejecting the Execution Application the applicant for recovery of amount Rs. 2,64,000/-

AND in the meantime directing the court below to issue a recovery certificate against the Opposite Party No. 2 for amount of Rs. 2,64,000/- fr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top