SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(UK) 339

RAJEEV GUPTA, J.C.S.RAWAT
HARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants :Smt. Pushpa Joshi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT

(Per : Hon’ble J.C.S. Rawat, J.)

This Criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 26.08.1989 passed by Shri M.L. Singhal, the then Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh in S.T. No. 30/1988 State Vs. Hari Singh & another, whereby the appellant-Hari Singh was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and for six years under section 302 & section 307 IPC respectively. The appellant-Inder Singh was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment of life and for six years under Section 302/34 IPC and section 307/34 IPC respectively. Both sentences were to run concurrently.

2. The facts, in nutshell, are that Hari Singh and Inder Singh (appellants) are the cousins of Laxman Singh – informant and Kundal Singh – deceased. Mohan Singh PW2 is the real uncle of appellants (Hari Singh & Inder Singh), Laxman Singh PW1 and Kundal Singh-deceased. The family of the appellants-accused were not having good relations with the families of Kundal Singh (deceased) and Laxman Singh PW1. They were not even on visiting and talking terms for the past six to seven years from the date of incident. The appellants-accused devoured the land of the family of the deceased-K









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top