2008 UAD 915
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.C. Verma
Writ Petition (M/S) 180/2008
M/S SKI & SNOW RESORTS PVT. LTD. – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondents
Decided on : 30.09.2008
(B) Interpretation of statutes — Principles for — Enumerated.
(Paras 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 25, 26)
¼v½ mdizd tehankjh mUewyu o Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e] 1950] /kkjk,a&157-B] 166] 167 o dqek¡Å o mRrjkapy tehankjh mUewyu o Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e] 1960] /kkjk,a&3¼18½] 47] 52 & /kkjk&157-B] ;wdihdtSMd,d ,.M ,ydvkjd ,DV] tks jkT; esa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds O;fDr;ksa dks Hkwfe vUrj.k djus ls jksdrh gS] tSlk fd ;wdihd ,DV uad 20 vkQ 1982 MCY;wdbd,Qd 3-6-1981] }kjk u;k lSD'ku }kjk tksM+k x;k gS & /kkjk&3¼18½] 47 o 52 ds vk/kkj ij] dqek¡Å o mRrjkapy tehankjh mUewyu o Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e ij ykxw ugha gksrh & vr% vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds O;fDr] }kjk] viuh Hkwfe dk mRrjk[kaM jkT; esa] fod; i= ;k iV~Vs }kjk fd;k x;k vUrj.k oS/k gS o ca/kudkjh gS & mdizd tehankjh mUewyu o Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk&157-B Hkh bl ij ykxw ugha gksrh & ifj.kker% mdizd tehankjh mUewyu o Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e dh /kkjkvksa&166 o 167 ds vUrxZr] ,sls fod; i= ds vk/kkj ij dh xbZ izfd;k] fof/k dh izfd;k dk nq#i;ksx gksus ds dkj.k] jn~n dj nsus ;ksX; gSA ¼izLrj 10] 11] 12] 13] 14] 15] 16] 23] 25] 26] 28] 30½ ¼c½ lafof/k;ksa dh O;k[;k & ds fl)kar & fxuk fn;s x;s gSaA ¼izLrj 17] 18] 19] 20] 21] 22] 25] 26½
Hon’ble P.C. Verma, J.
By means of this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari for quashing the proceedings initiated under Section 166 & 167 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 pending before the respondent no. 2/Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Joshimath, “District Chamoli in case no. 6 of 2007-08, State v. Vijai Singh Pal & others.
2. Revant and undisputed facts of the case are that the petitioner purchased land comprised in plots no. 15, 16 and 17 measuring 2 nali, 5 nali and 8 nali 12 muthi respectively in Village Auli Lagga Salul Dungra, Tehsil Joshimath, District Chamoli through the registered sale deed dated 24.4.1996 from Dr. Vijai Singh Pal and others, who belong to Scheduled Tribe. Another plot no. 18 measuring about 31 nali situated in aforesaid village belonging to those persons was also taken on lease by the petitioner. The land has been declared as non-agricultural land by the order of the then Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Joshimath. The petitioner has constructed a resort over the said land in the name of Cliff Top Club. During the construction of the resort, the area of Auli was brought under the provisions of U.P. (Regulations of Building Operations) Act. The notices were issued to the petitioner for raising alleged unauthorized constructions and an order for demolition was passed by the Prescribed Authority, against which the appeal of the petitioner was allowed by the Controlling Authority by the order dated 28.7.1999 and order of the Prescribed Authority was set aside. After the construction of the resort, the same was registered under the Sarai Act.
3. The land in Village Auli Lagga Salul Dungra was proposed to be acquired for promotion of winter games. The land of the petitioner was also included in the acquisition scheme. Petitioner preferred a writ petition before the State Government and after due consideration the land in dispute was excluded from acquisition due to construction of a resort over the aforesaid plots. In the meantime, petitioner has filed a writ petition before this Court, which was dismissed as infructuous vide order dated 23.8.2005 passed by Division Bench of this Court.
4. Thereafter Tourism Department applied for demarcation of its land to the respondent no. 2 upon which a notice was issued to the petitioner. While the demarcation case was pending, the Tourism Department applied to the respondent no. 2 to remove the alleged encroachment by the letter dated 1.12.2007. Thereafter on 2.12.2007 a part of the resort was demolished with police aid alleging it to be an encroachment on the land of Tourism Department. Being aggrieved, petitioner filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Gopeshwar, Chamoli seeking permanent injunction.
5. On 2.12.2007 itself, an F.I.R. was lodged by the respondent no. 2 against Mr. Atul Sharma, Managing Director of petitioner-company and some other persons under Sections 166, 167, 218 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Joshimath, Chamoli. Thereafter Managing Director of the petitioner-company filed a Writ Petitioner (Criminal) No. 12 of 2008 before this Court, wherein an interim order dated 8.1.2008 has been passed by Division Bench of this Court preventing arrest of Mr. Atul Sharma, Managing Director of the petitioner-company.
6. Respondent no. 2 also initiated proceedings under Section 166 and 167 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 on the basis of the reports dated 28.11.2007 and 30.11.2007 submitted by Revenue Inspector, Joshimath and Tehsildar, Joshimath respectively. On the basis of these reports, a case no. 6 of 2007-08 has been registered and show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner to quash the proceedings of the aforesaid case no. 6 of 2007-08.
7. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the materials available on record.
8. The respondent n
2. M/s Agrawal Trading Corp. & Ors. v. The Collector of Customs & Ors. (1972) 1 SCC 553.
4. The State of Madhya Pradesh
6. Mariappa and others v. State of Karnataka and others AIR 1998 SC 1334.
7. M/s Ashok Service Centre and Others v. State of Orissa (1983) 2 SCC 82.
3. Bolani Ores Ltd. V. State of Orissa (1974) 2 SCC 777.
5. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. V. Union of India & Another (1979) 2 SCC 529.
1. Shamrao V. Parulekar & Others v. District Magistrate & Others AIR 1952 SC 324.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.