SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(UK) 438

2009 (1) UAD 637
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Hon’ble Mr. Justice P.C. Verma
Writ Petition (M/S) 180 of 2008
M/S SKI & SNOW RESORTS PVT. LTD. – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondents
Decided on : 30.09.2008

Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Adv. with Mr. Anant Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondents No. 1-2: Mr. Bindesh Kumar Gupta, Addl. Adv. General

Headnote:U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, Sec. 157(A), Kumaon and Uttarakhand Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1960, Secs. 3(18), 47 and 52 — Sec. 157-B was inserted in the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act w.e.f. 3.6.1981, — Since there is nothing in the said Amending Act to show that the said provision was intended to apply to the areas governed by the Kumaon & Uttarakhand Z.A. & L.R. Act — Provisions of Sec. 157-B of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act cannot be extended to the area governed by Kumaon & Uttarakhand Z.A. & L.R. Act — Therefore, the members of Schedule Tribes are entitled to transfer their holdings by sale, etc. — Such sales shall not be impeded by any statutory provisions and shall be legal, valid, binding and effective. (Paras 18 to 28)

        mRrj izns'k tehankjh fouk'k vkSj Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e] 1950] ?kkjk-157(A) dqekÅ¡ vkSj mRrjk[k.M tehankjh fouk'k vkSj Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e] 1960] /kkjk&3¼18½] 47 vkSj 52 & /kkjk-157(B) mdizd tehankjh fouk'k vkSj Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e esa fnukad 3-6-1981 ls tksM+h xbZ gS & ih MCY;w fd mDr la'kksf/kr vf/kfu;e esa dqN Hkh ,slk ugha gS ftlls ;g tkfgj gks fd mijksDr izkfo/kku dqekÅ¡ vkSj mRrjk[k.M tehankjh fouk'k vkSj Hkwfe lq/kkj vf/kfu;e esa ml ds }kjk 'kkflr {ks=ksa ds fy, tksM+k x;k Fkk & èkkjk-157(B) U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act ds izkfo/kku dks dqekÅ¡ vkSj mRrjk[k.M Z.A. & L.R. Act ds }kjk 'kkflr {ks=ksa esa ykxw ugha fd;k tk ldrk & blfy, f'kM;wy VªkbCl ds lnL;ksa }kjk viuh Hkwfe dks fod; fd;s tkus dk vf/kdkj gS & ,slh fcdh dks fdlh fof/kd izkfo/kku ds rgr ck/kk ugha igq¡pkbZ tk ldsxh tks dkuwuh :i ls mi;qDr ck/;dkjh vkSj izHkkoh gksxhA ¼izLrj 18 ls 28½

JUDGMENT

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari for quashing the proceedings initiated under Section 166 & 167 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 pending before the respondent no. 2/Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Joshimath, District Chamoli in case no. 6 of 2007-08, State v. Vijay Singh Pal & others.

2. Relevant and undisputed facts of the case are that the petitioner purchased land comprised in plots no. 15, 16 and 17 measuring 2 nali, 5 nali and 8 nali 12 muthi respectively in Village Auli Lagga Salul Dungra, Tehsil Joshimath, District Chamoli through the registered sale deed dated 24.4.1996 from Dr. Vijai Singh Pal and others, who belong to Scheduled Tribe. Another plot no. 18 measuring about 31 nali situated in aforesaid village belonging to those persons was also taken on lease by the petitioner. The land has been declared as non-agricultural land by the order of the then Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Joshimath. The petitioner has constructed a resort over the said land in the name of Cliff Top Club. During the construction of the resort, the area of Auli was brought under the provisions of U.P. (Regulations of Building Operations) Act. The notices were issued to the petitioner for raising alleged unauthorized constructions and an order for demolition was passed by the Prescribed Authority, against which the appeal of the petitioner was allowed by the Controlling Authority by the order dated 28.7.1999 and order of the Prescribed Authority was set aside. After the construction of the resort, the same was registered under the Sarai Act.

3. The land in Village Auli Lagga Salul Dungra was proposed to be acquired for promotion of winter games. The land of the petitioner was also included in the acquisition scheme. Petitioner preferred a writ petition before the State Government and after due consideration the land in dispute was excluded from acquisition due to construction of a resort over the aforesaid plots. In the meantime, petitioner has filed a writ petition before this Court, which was dismissed as infructuous vide order dated 23.8.2005 passed by Division Bench of this Court.

4. Thereafter Tourism Department applied for demarcation of its land to the respondent no. 2 upon which a notice was issued to the petitioner. While the demarcation case was pending, the Tourism Department applied to the respondent no. 2 to remove the alleged encroachment by the letter dated 1.12.2007. Thereafter on 2.12.2007 a part of the resort was demolished with police aid alleging it to be an encroachment on the land of Tourism Department. Being aggrieved, petitioner filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Gopeshwar, Chamoli seeking permanent injunction.

5. On 2.12.2007 itself, an F.I.R. was lodged by the respondent no. 2 against Mr. Atul Sharma, Managing Director of petitioner-company and some other persons under Sections 166, 167, 218 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Joshimath, Chamoli. Thereafter Managing Director of the petitioner-company filed a Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 12 of 2008 before this Court, wherein an interim order dated 8.1.2008 has been passed by Division Bench of this Court preventing arrest of Mr. Atul Sharma, Managing Director of the petitioner-company.

6. Respondent No. 2 also initiated proceedings under Section 166 and 167 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 on the basis of the reports dated 28.11.2007 & 30.11.2007 submitted by Revenue Inspector, Joshimath and Tehsildar, Joshimath respectively. On the basis of these reports, a case no. 6 of 2007-08 has been registered and show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner to quash the proceedings of the aforesaid case no. 6 of 2007-08.

7. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have carefully perused the materials available on record.

8. The respondent no. 2 after calling reports










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top