2009 (2) UAD 265
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hon’ble Dr. Justice Arijit Pasayat and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarun Chatterjee
Civil Appeal No. 4367 of 2000
M/S. RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, NOIDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. & ORS. – Respondents
Decided on : 15.04.2009
(Paras 12, 13)
(B) Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Sec. 47-A, Art. 63 of Schedule to State of U.P. — Document presented for registration before registering officer, being a lease — The transfer to the members of the association the sub-lessees was an assignment of the leasehold rights — Demised land was merely an enjoyment of the land and not transferof ownership — Art. 63 of the Stamp Act as applicable to State of U.P. will apply to such document — Duty chargeable to such instrument is not on market value of the property — But will be on consideration indicated in the same — Section 47-A of Indian Stamp Act would have no application to such documents — Section 47-A would be applicable only when Art. 23 thereof is applicable. (Paras 24 to 28)
(C) Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Art. 63 — Determination of, consideration mentioned in the document — Such date would be date of entering into the agreement and registration thereof — There cannot be a strait jacket formula for determining the same.
(Paras 27 to 30)
¼v½ Hkkjrh; LVkEi ,DV] 1899] /kkjk&47-A tSlk fd mdizd ljdkj }kjk la'kksfèkr fd;k x;k mldk mn~ns'; vkSj foLrkj & Hkkjrh; LVkEi ,DV dh /kkjk&48-
a dk mn~ns'; fdlh fod; i= vFkok migkj i= vFkok rdlhe i= vFkok le>kSrk i= ds iathdj.k gks tkus ij Hkh mlesa nf'kZr ifjlEifRr ds voewY;kadu dks izHkkoghu fd;k tkuk gS & /kkjk&47-A ds ykxw djus ds fy, jftLVªh foHkkx ds vf/kdkfj;ksa ds fy, ;g ns[kuk i;kZIr ugha gS fd nLrkost esa nf'kZr ewY; cktkjh ewY; ls de gS & ijUrq mudks ;g larqf"V gks tkuh pkfg, fd lEifRr dk ewY; de n'kkZ; tkus dk iz;kl fd;k x;k gS & /kkjk&47-A ¼2½ dks ckjhdh ls ns[kus ls ;g irk pyrk gS fd ml dsl esa ,sls vfèkdkjh ds ikl fo'okl djus dk fd lEifRr dk ewY; de djds n'kkZ;k x;k gS i;kZIr vk/kkj gksuk pkfg, og ,sls dsl dks ftyk/kh'k dks lanfHkZr dj nsxk ijUrq iath;u djus ds mijkUr ghA ¼izLrj 12] 13½
¼c½ Hkkjrh; LVkEi ,DV] 1899] /kkjk&47-A] vuqPNsn 63 mRrj izns'k ljdkj dh vuqlwph dk & iath;u vf/kdkjh ds lEeq[k iêsnkjh dk ,d nLrkost iath;u okLrs izLrqr fd;k x;k & fdlh ,lksfl,'ku ds lnL;ksa ds uke varj.k ,d izdkj ls mi iêsnkjksa dks iêsnkjh ds vf/kdkjksa dk lkSaik tkuk Fkk & iês okyh Hkwfe ek= Hkwfe dk mi;ksx djuk ek= gS u fd feyfd;r dk varj.k fd;k tkuk & vuqPNsn 63 LVkEi ,DV tSlk fd mRrj izns'k ljdkj ij ykxw gksrk gS og ,slh nLrkost ij ykxw gksxk & ,sls nLrkost esa M~;wVh dh olwyh lEifRr dh cktkjh dher ij ugha dh tkrh gS & cfYd nLrkost esa nf'kZr ekfy;r@dher ij olwy dh tk,xh & ,sls nLrkost ij Hkkjrh; LVkEi ,DV dh /kkjk&47-A ykxw ugha gksxh & /kkjk&47-A ogha ykxw gksxh tgk¡ vuqPNsn 23 ykxw gksrk gSA ¼izLrj 24 ls 28½
¼l½ Hkkjrh; LVkEi ,DV] 1899] vuqPNsn 63 & nLrkost esa n'kkZ;s x;s ewY; dk vkadyu fd;k tkuk & og rkjh[k nLrkost ds iath;u vkSj vuqcU/k fd;s tkus dh rkjh[k ekuh tk,xh & blds fy, dksbZ lh/kk lPpk lw= ugah cuk;k tk ldrk ftl ds }kjk vkadyu fd;k tk ldsA ¼izLrj 27 ls 30½
Tarun Chatterjee, J.— This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and order dated 27th of May, 1999 of the Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad in Writ Petition No. 38748 of 1997 whereby, the Division Bench of the High Court had dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the appellants above named.
2. The relevant facts leading to the filing of this appeal, as emerging from the case made out by the appellant may be summarized as follows :-
New Okhla Industrial Development Area (in short “Noida”) allotted lands to several Co-operative Housing Societies by execution of lease deeds with such Co-operative Group Housing Societies in respect of the lands allotted to them. The said lease deeds contain various restrictions on the transfer of leasehold rights which, interalia include :
(1) Restrictions on the transfer without prior consent of the Noida authorities by transfer memorandum.
(2) Construction of buildings on such leasehold lands had to be made within a stipulated period from the date of allotment failing which the leases of the respective Co-operative Housing societies were liable to be resumed by the Noida authorities.
3. The lease deeds also contained another clause, which stipulated that such lease deeds must be compulsorily registered with the sub-Registrar. It may be clarified that Noida is the lessor, the cooperative societies are the lessees, members of the cooperative societies are sub-lessees and the present appellants are the assignees.
4. The appellant is the Resident Welfare Association, Noida, (hereinafter called the “Association”). The members of the association executed various agreements for transfer of leasehold rights with the co-operative societies and its members from 1988 onwards. Each of the agreements for transfer of leasehold rights entered into by the members of the association with the lessees and the sub-lessees were registered with the Office of the Sub-Registrar, Noida. It may be kept on record that from 1984 to June 1997, Noida authorities were injuncted by the Civil Court from issuing transfer memorandums for grant permission for transfer of leasehold rights. The order of injunction was operative from 1988 and continued almost throughout the State of U.P. till July 1997. It may also be kept on record that the agreements for transfer of leasehold rights were denoted as agreements of sale. The various transactions entered into by the members of the association may be categorized in three different heads :
(1) By the agreements of transfer entered into and possession taken over on payment of most or all of the consideration due and such agreements being duly registered with the Office of the Sub-Registrar, Noida on payment of stamp duty charges at half of the stamp duty payable on a conveyance for the consideration set forth in the agreement in accordance with Article 5(b)(1) of Schedule I-B to the UP Stamp Act,
(2) By the agreements entered into and possession not taken under the agreements, but later the said agreements were duly registered with the Sub-Registrar, Noida,
(3) In both the above mentioned categories, the agreements for transfer were either for a plot of land on which construction was made thereafter by the assignees (members of the association) of the leasehold property out of their own funds or the agreements for a plot of land along with the building constructed thereon. Thus in some cases, as noted hereinabove, the plots were purchased along with small construction which was later demolished and the assignees constructed new building after obtaining new sanction plans using their own funds.
5. On 1st of July, 1997, a public notice was issued advertising that Noida authorities shall issue transfer memorandums with respect to the transfer of plots in question upon terms and conditions including payment of transfer premium. Upon issuance of the said notice, various members of the association applied for and obtained transfer memorandums from No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.