2012 (1) N.C.C. 631
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
Criminal Appeal No. 1539 of 2001
ASHOK KUMAR – Accused/Appellant
Versus
STATE – Opposite Party
Decided on : 20.03.2012
(Paras 21, 22, 27)
(B) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Secs. 7, 13(1)(d) r/w Sec. 13(2) — Provisions of — Presumption of taking the illegal gratification — Every acceptance of illegal gratification whether preceded by a demand or not, would be covered by Sec. 7 of the Act — But if the acceptance of an illegal gratification is in pursuance of a demand by the public servant, then it would also fall u/s 13(1)(d) of the Act — The act alleged against the respondent, of demanding and receiving illegal gratification constitutes an offence both u/s 7 and u/s 13(1)(d) of the Act — Held that the said money was recovered in pursuance of demand made by the accused/appellant which is evident from the entire sequence of events and the statements of witnesses — Therefore, the accused/appellant rightly convicted and sentenced u/s 7 — The conviction and sentence, upheld. (Paras 31 to 35)
¼v½ Hkz"Vkpkj izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] 1988] /kkjk 7, 13(1)(d) lifBr /kkjk 13¼2½ & n.Muh; vijk/k & vfHk;qDr@vihykFkhZ ds dCts ls VªSi Vhe }kjk nksf"kr iSls dh izkfIr & f'kdk;rdrkZ (PW1) us vfHk;qDr@'kk[kk izca/kd dks tek djkus ds fy, #- 500@& fn, vius [kkrs esa tek djkus ds fy, vkSj tek iphZ okmpj ij gLrk{kj dj ys[kkdkj dks fn;s & vorfjr & orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr vkSj f'kdk;rdrkZ ds chp laca/k lkSgknZiw.kZ ugha Fks vkSj bl fLFkfr esa] ;g iz'kaluh; ugha gS fd f'kdk;rdrkZ 'kk[kk izca/kd dks #i;s nsxk vius [kkrs esa tek djus ds fy, & blds vykok] fdlh Hkh ekeys esa 'kk[kk izca/kd] xzkgd ds [kkrs esa iSlk tek djus ds okns ds lkFk iSls dks Lohdkj djs vuqfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ¼izLrj 21] 22] 27½
¼c½ Hkz"Vkpkj izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] 1988] /kkjk 7, 13(1)(d) lifBr /kkjk 13¼2½ & ds izko/kku & fj'or ysus dk vuqeku & voS/k ifjrks"k.k pkgs ekaxk x;k gks ;k ugha dh gj LohÑfr] vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 7 esa doj gksrh gS & ysfdu vxj ,d voS/k ifjrks"k.k dh LohÑfr yksd lsod }kjk ekax ds vuqlj.k esa gS] rks ;g Hkh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13(1)(d) ds vUrxZr vkrh gS & blfy, voS/k ifjrks"k.k ds vijk/k dk xBu nksuksa èkkjkvksa 7 o 13(1)(d) vf/kfu;e 1988 esa vkrk gS & vorfjr & fd iSls vfHk;qDr@vihykFkhZ }kjk dh xbZ ekax ds vuqlj.k esa cjken fd;s x;s Fks tks fd ?kVukvksa ds vuqØe vkSj xokgksa ds c;ku ls Li"V gS & vfHk;qDr@vihykFkhZ dks /kkjk 7 ds rgr nks"kh ik;k x;k & nks"k o ltk lghA ¼izLrj 31 ls 35½
Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
1. Heard Mr. S.K. Agarwal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. M.K. Singhal, Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate for the Central Bureau of Investigation.
2. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 30.7.1999 passed by the Court of Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Uttar Pradesh (East), Dehradun in C.B.I. Case No. 6 of 1992, whereby the present appellant has been convicted and sentenced under Section 7 and Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
3. The brief facts of the case, as per the prosecution, are that the complainant moved a written complaint before Superintendent of Police (C.B.I), Dehradun on 31.12.1991, which was later registered as an F.I.R. on direction of the Superintendent of Police (C.B.I.). In the said F.I.R. it was stated by the complainant that he is a member of Scheduled Caste community. He had moved an application for loan before the Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Caste Finance & Development Corporation, Dehradun (from hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) for opening a grocery shop. When he later enquired about his loan from the office of the Corporation he was informed that all the formalities at their end had been completed and the papers were forwarded to Punjab National Bank at its Race Course Branch, Dehradun. Consequently when he went to the Bank he was told that the papers have reached the Bank and after the formalities are completed, he will get the loan. After this the complainant states that he completed all the formalities of the Bank and completed all the documentation work. After one month he met the manager of the Bank Sri A.K. Goel, who assured him that loan will be sanctioned. All the same, even after one month when the loan money was not received by him he met Sri Goel on 30.12.1991, along with stamp papers and quotations when he was told by Sri Goel that if you give me Rs. 500/- then only you will get your cheque of the loan amount. The complainant then states that he does not want to give bribe and requested the police to initiate proceedings on his complaint. The F.I.R. was consequently lodged on 31.12.1991 at about 1.30 PM at the C.B.I. Police Station at Dehradun, and a case was registered at Special Police Establishment Branch, Dehradun as R.C.-41 (A)/91/DAD against the accused under Section 7 of the Act, and Inspector Bhagwan Singh was deputed to investigate the matter. Soon after that, a team was constituted to lay a trap. Shri R.D. Joshi (P.W.2) and Shri Satish Gupta (P.W.3), who were employed in Pyrites Phosphates & Chemicals Limited, Dehradun (from hereinafter referred to as P.P.C.L), were procured as witnesses and were made members of the trap team. A pre-trap demonstration was conducted at the C.B.I. office, Dehradun in presence of all the members of the team in which the manner of trapping, the use of phenolphthalein as well as other methods to be employed for trapping were made known to all the members, and subsequently instructions were also given to the officers. On the same day i.e. 31.12.1991 at about 3:30 P.M., the members of the trap team reached the neighbourhood of the concerned Bank namely Punjab National Bank, Race Course Branch, Dehradun. On the same date at about 4.30 PM accused/appellant Shri A.K. Goel was caught red handed in the premises of Punjab National Bank, Race Course Branch, Dehradun, while demanding and consequently accepting a sum of Rs. 500/- as an illegal gratification from the complainant for disbursing and sanctioning the loan of Rs. 10,000/- in his favour. The tainted currency note of Rs. 500/- delivered by the complainant to the accused/appellant were also recovered in the proceeding from the left pocket of the accused’s trousers. The required formalities were completed by the trap team and the documents were also seized by the team from the bank which were formed as exhibits and placed before the Court. The accused/appellant was arrested
5. T. Subramanian v. State of T.N. (2006) 1 SCC 401.
6. State repr. By Inspector of Police, Pudukottai
4. Punjabrao v. State of Maharashtra
1. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Haryana (1976) 1 SCC 389.
2. Gura Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2001) 2 SCC 205.
3. Mrinal Das and Ors. V. State of Tripura (2011) 9 SCC 479.
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.