SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(UK) 53

V.K.Bist
JAGDISH PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Sharad Sharma, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. J.S. Bisht, with Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, holding brief of Mr. Anil Dabral, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel
For the Petitioners:Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief Holder
For the Petitioners:Mr. Yogesh Pachaulia, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. R.C. Arya, Standing Counsel
For the Petitioners:Mr. Virendra Kaparwan, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief Holder
For the Petitioners:Mr. M.S. Bhandari, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief Holder
For the Petitioners:Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. A.S. Rawat, Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Pankaj Tangwan, Brief Holder

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J.

Controversy involved in all the petitions is identical, though the petitioners vary, however the defendants are same and this Court has to adhere and adjudicate upon a common question of law, therefore, common order is being passed in all the petitions. Writ Petition No. 1257 of 2011 (M/S) shall be the leading case.

2. All the petitions have been filed assailing the orders of the Appellate Courts by which orders of Prescribed Authorities under U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) were upheld. The petitioners are challenging the validity of eviction proceedings initiated against them by the State Government under the Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that no proceedings under the Act could be initiated against the petitioners after the period of two years from the date of creation of State of Uttarakhand, as the Act has not been adapted by the State of Uttarakhand within stipulated period of two years, therefore, in absence of any adaptation order of State of Uttarakhand, the provisions of the Act cannot be permitted to be invoked after completion of st





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top