SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(UK) 252

B.S.Verma
NAGAR PANCHAYAT SULTANPUR – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMOOD – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Arvind Vashisth, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble B.S.Verma, J. (Oral)

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 25.11.2009 passed by IInd Additional Civil Judge (S.D.), Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar in O.S. No. 264 of 2006, Mahmood & another Vs Nagar Panchayat, Sultanpur and rejected the application of the petitioner (Paper No. 119C) for issuing Survey Commission.

2. Brief facts of the case, giving rise to the petition, are that plaintiff/respondents filed a original suit No. 264 of 2006 before the Civil Judge (J.D.), Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar for permanent injunction. The said suit was filed with the pleadings that plaintiff is in possession of land recorded in Khassra (plot) No. 803/7 measuring 0.098 hectare situated in Village Sultanpur. It was also asserted that the said land was recorded in the name of the father of the plaintiff. The petitioner filed written statement denying the pleadings of the plaint stating therein that Khasra (plot) No. 803 is a big pond and is property of petitioner defendant. It has further alleged that Khasara (plot) No. 803/07 relied by the plaintiff is neither





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top