SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Sunni Central Board of Waqf – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Director of Consolidation – Respondent
Since both the petitions were decided by the common judgment a review petitions have been filed against the common judgment, hence, both the review petitions are being decided by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience, we are narrating the facts of WPMS No. 135 of 2006.
2. The review petition has been filed with the prayer to review the order dated 15.02.2014 passed by learned single Judge of this Court. The writ petitions arise out of consolidation proceedings and the petitioner, which is "The Sunni Central Board of Waqf'', had challenged the order dated 11.03.1985 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. The writ petition was dismissed after hearing all the parties by a learned single Judge. The petitioner did not choose to file a review petition immediately but tried his luck before the Hon'ble Apex Court by filing Special Leave to Appeal (in short "SLP''). In the said SLP, the Hon'ble Apex Court after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents, dismissed the SLP vide order dated 06.09.2014 by passing following order:-
"Heard learned counsel for the parties. No ground for interference is made out
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.