U.C. Dhyani, J.

1. Since the above-noted civil revisions arise out of a common judgment and order and the facts of the civil revisions and law governing the field is identical, therefore, they are being decided together, by this common judgment, for the sake of brevity and convenience.

2. Civil Revision no. 48 of 2017 shall be the leading case.

3. By means of above noted civil revisions, the revisionists seek following relief, among others:

(i) to allow the revisions with costs by setting the judgment and order dated 07.04.2017, passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Vikasnagar, Dehradun in land acquisition cases filed by the private respondents.

(ii) to dismiss the land acquisition cases filed by the private respondents in the court of learned Addl. District Judge, Vikasnagar, Dehradun.

4. An application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC was moved on behalf of the revisionists. Learned court below (Addl. District Judge, Vikasnagar, Dehradun) disposed of the same and directed the Power Grid Corporation of India (revisionist herein) to file their written statements. By the impugned order, it was directed that since the issue of limitation is a mixed question of law and fact, therefore,