DIPAK MISRA
SATYANANDA SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
RATIKANTA PANDA – Respondent
DEEPAK MISRA, J.
( 1 ) BEING aggrieved by the order dated 12-7-95 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) First Court, Cuttack in Title Suit No. 220 of 1995 whereby the said trial Judge accepted the suit as maintainable and declined to deal with the point of maintainability as envisaged under O. 7, R. 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner has approached this Court in the present revision.
( 2 ) THE opposite party as plaintiff instituted the suit in the court of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) First Court, Cuttack with a number of prayers which are as follows :-" (A) For a declaration that all the gold ornaments found in the locker No. 113 on 4-9-91 when the same was broken open belong to plaintiff. (b) For a direction to defendant No. 1 to deliver the gold ornaments to the plaintiff on payment of locker hire charges from January, 1985 till date of delivery of the ornaments to the plaintiff. (c)Permanently restraining defendant No. 4 from claiming the said gold ornaments. (d) Any other relief or reliefs to which the plaintiff may be found entitled. (e) Cost of the litigation. "
( 3 ) WITH regard to the cause of action, in para-39 of the plaint the plaintif
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.