U.C.DHYANI
MUKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
U. C. Dhyani, J.
1. By means of present Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicant seeks following relief, among others:
“To quash the impugned order on charge dated 19.10.2015; framing of charges dated 31/10/2015 by the Special Magistrate, CBI, Dehradun in C.B.I. Case No.620 of 2014; CBI vs. Mukesh Kumar under Section 120-B/420/468/471 IPC pending in the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate (C.B.I.)/ACJM First Dehradun, Uttarakhand and also quash further / entire proceeding C.B.I. Case No.620 of 2014 C.B.I. vs. Mukesh Kumar under Section 120-B/420/468/471 IPC pending in the Court of Special Judicial Magistrate (C.B.I.) / ACJM First Dehradun, Uttarakhand.”
2. An application under Section 239 Cr.P.C. was moved by the applicant before the trial court for seeking his discharge. The said application was dismissed. Thereafter, the charge for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC read with Section 120-B IPC was framed, vide order dated 31.10.2015. The same is subject matter of challenge in the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The controversy in the instant case revolves around chargesheet no.2/2005, which has been forwarded by the CB
1. Onkar Nath Mishra & others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & another
2. Preeti Gupta & another vs. State of Jharkhand & another (2010) 7 SCC 667.
3. Rumi Dhar (Smt.) vs. State of West Bengal & another
4. Sajjan Kumar vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
5. Shakson Belthissor vs. State of Kerala & another
6. Shoraj Singh Ahlawat & others vs. State of U.P. & another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.