SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(UK) 329

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SUDHANSHU DHULIA, J.
Jyoti Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 160, 498 of 2018
Decided On : 26-09-2018

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sudhir Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder and Lalit Sharma, Advocate

At the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case needs to be seen based on the materials filed with the charge-sheet and the evidence produced by the Investigating Officer.

Headnote:

Section 482 CrPC - Framing of Charges - Sections 504, 506, 420 and 389 IPC - Summary of Acts and Sections

Fact of the Case:

The case involved two petitions challenging the framing of charges under Sections 504, 506, 420, and 389 IPC. The accused had filed an FIR against the complainant alleging rape and blackmail. In response, the complainant filed an FIR against the accused and her husband for extortion and false cases.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence presented during the investigation supported the framing of charges under the mentioned sections. The court dismissed the applications filed under Section 482 CrPC and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Issues: The main issue was whether the charges framed under Sections 504, 506, 420, and 389 IPC were supported by the evidence presented during the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case needs to be seen based on the materials filed with the charge-sheet and the evidence produced by the Investigating Officer. The court also highlighted that the trial court should proceed in the matter in letter and spirit of Section 309 CrPC and conclude the trial at the earliest.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the applications filed under Section 482 CrPC and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

JUDGMENT :

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

1. These two petitions have been filed invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 CrPC. In both the criminal miscellaneous applications, the applicants have challenged the framing of charges against them pertaining to offences under Sections 504, 506, 420 and 389 IPC in Criminal Case No. 2607 of 2014, State v. Jyoti Singh & Another.

2. The facts of the case must be narrated first. Ms. Jyoti Singh, the accused/applicant in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 160 of 2018 above, had initially lodged an FIR herself against one Mr. Vivek Swarup (complainant in the present case) on 12.01.2014, at Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital, alleging offences under Sections 376, 328 and 354-D IPC. Her case was that Vivek Swarup S/o. Jagdish Narayan Srivastava, who at the relevant time was working as the Finance Officer in Mandi Samiti, Udham Singh Nagar, where the complainant (Ms. Jyoti Singh) was also employed, used to summon her frequently in his chamber. Being her superior, his orders were being obeyed. One day he took her to his house and offered her a cup of coffee which was 'spiked', and as a result she lost her consciousness, and was then raped by Mr. Vivek Swarup, who also thereafter took obscene photographs of her from his mobile camera. She then states in her FIR that though she immediately wanted to report the matter to the police authorities, but could not do so as she was threatened by Mr. Vivek Swarup that if she does so, her photographs will be circulated and she would be defamed. Taking this threat seriously and fearing the consequences, she held back. She further states in her FIR, that when she reported this matter to her husband Mr. Pankaj Agarwal (who is the also an applicant before this Court in criminal miscellaneous application no. 498 of 2018), it resulted in her divorce on 01.02.2013, and she was thrown out from her matrimonial house. As a result of the rape committed by Mr. Vivek Swarup, she conceived and gave birth to a child later. The applicant further says that due to these acts on the part of Mr. Vivek Swarup, her life has been ruined, as the applicant has not only raped her but he is also continuously blackmailing her.

3. Consequent to the aforesaid first information report lodged by Ms. Jyoti Singh (one of the applicants before this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 160/2018) the accused Vivek Swarup was arrested. While the accused Vivek Swarup was in jail, he too lodged an FIR against Ms. Jyoti Singh and Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, who are the applicants here in the two connected Criminal Miscellaneous Applications. The FIR was registered at Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital on 14.06.2014 under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of IPC. The allegations made by the complainant Mr. Vivek Swarup are that since July 2011, he was working in the Directorate, Training and Employment Exchange, Haldwani on the post of Finance Officer. The applicant Ms. Jyoti Singh was also working in that office as a Junior Assistant. The complainant (Vivek Swarup) by this time had already taken divorce from his wife, which was decreed by Family Court, Allahabad on 13.3.2010 and against the decree an appeal was pending before the High Court of judicature at Allahabad. From August 2012 onwards, Ms. Jyoti Singh presented herself as a victim of circumstances and domestic violence, who was being constantly ill treated by her husband, Sri Pankaj Agarwal. She complained that she was very upset and unhappy with her husband (her husband at that time is present applicant Sri Pankaj Agarwal, in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 498/2018), whom she alleged to be a characterless person, etc. In November 2012, Ms. Jyoti Singh finally proposed marriage to which he replied that his divorce is in a final stage and as soon as the divorce is finalized, he would marry her. On this arrangement, the sisters of Jyoti Singh were also in agreement. In December 2012, Ms. Jyoti Singh and her husband Panka

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      Judicial Analysis

      AI

      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top