SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Ram Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
1. This writ petition has been preferred by the present petitioners, who are present in person before this Court and duly identified by Mr. M.K. Ray, learned Counsel for the petitioners. Similarly, the complainant/respondent No. 3 too is present in the Court and is identified by Mr. M.S. Bhandari, learned Counsel for respondent No. 3.
2. The respondent No. 3 is the complainant who lodged an F.I.R. on 08.09.2018, which has been registered as Case Crime No. 49 of 2018, under sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504, 506 and 323 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Srinagar, District Pauri Garhwal.
3. This Court, in principle, is not willing to accept the contentions raised in the Compounding Application because it is a very pathetic state of affairs that these students who have taken admission in one of the renowned Universities of the State, namely H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar have come up to build their career at cost and expenditure which is being met by their parents but the unfortunate part of it is that they have been engaging themselves in riot-ism by actively participating in the election proceedings and creating pandemonium scene and thereby disturbin
B.S. Joshi and others v. State of Haryana and another
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd. (1996) 5 SCC 591
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another (2012) 10 SCC 303
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia and others v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre and others
Nikhil Merchant v. Central Bureau of Investigation and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.