SUDHANSHU DHULIA, R.C.KHULBE
Rakshit Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content you'd like me to analyze, and I will generate the key points with the appropriate references as specified.
JUDGMENT
1. This petition is a public interest petition filed by a practicing lawyer before this Court. He has raised concern about violations of environmental laws, at the hands of the private respondents, as well as violations of the orders of this Court as well as of Allahabad High Court, which were for the protection of "bugyals" in Uttarakhand. These orders, inter alia restricted human activities on a "bugyal" in Uttarakhand. We will shortly discuss as to what is a "bugyal".
2. The cause of action for filing the PIL according to the petitioner, came because the Government of Uttarakhand had given permission to respondent nos. 12 and 13 to hold wedding ceremonies of their sons at "Auli", in District Chamoli, Uttarakhand. The case of the petitioner is that where the wedding ceremonies, reception and a whole lot of other activities are to take place, is a "Bugyal" and activities of this nature, at such a large scale, cannot be permitted on a Bugyal, which is an eco sensitive place. "Bugyal" is the name given in Uttarakhand for Alpine meadows. A "bugyal" is a soft grass cover on land, high up in the mountains, beyond the tree lines, and is an ecosystem in itself.
3. It is true that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.