Back
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, R.C.KHULBE
Rajneesh Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction under article 226. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. challenge to selection process validity. (Para 2 , 7) |
| 3. petitioner's criteria for selection process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal framework for reservations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. regulations affirming varying qualifying marks. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. purpose of screening tests. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 7. migration from reserved to general category. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 8. judicial interpretations regarding relaxation in criteria. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 9. importance of executive orders for reservations. (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
| 10. procedural integrity in selection of candidates. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67) |
| 11. court's validation of selection process. (Para 68 , 69 , 70 , 71) |
| 12. dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 72) |
JUDGMENT
Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. - The jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been invoked by the petitioner aggrieved by the action of the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (for short "the Commission") in not selecting him for appointment to the post of Assistant Professor in Physical Chemistry in the Government Degree Colleges of the State. He seeks a w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
