N.S.DHANIK
Sumit Rana – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
N.S. Dhanik, J. - By means of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., applicants seek to set-aside the order dated 15.01.2021 passed by Sessions Judge, Rudraprayag in Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2020, "Smt. Santoshi Rana v. Sumit Rana & others".
2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent no. 2 moved a complaint before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rudraprayag against the applicants alleging therein that the applicants harassed the complainant for dowry and committed cruelty. The learned Magistrate dismissed the complaint of the respondent no. 2 under Section 203 Cr.P.C. Aggrieved against the same, the respondent no. 2 preferred a criminal revision before the District & Sessions Judge, Rudraprayag and the learned revisional court proceeded ex-parte against the applicants; the revisional court allowed the revision by setting aside the order dated 03.11.2020 and remanded the matter to the Magistrate for passing order afresh. Aggrieved against the same, present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed by the accused applicants.
3. This Court in Mukesh Kumar vs. Central Bureau Investigation has held, on the basis of plethora of decisions of Ho
Onkar Nath Mishra & others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & another
Preeti Gupta & another vs. State of Jharkhand & another
Rumi Dhar (Smt.) vs. State of West Bengal & another
Sajjan Kumar vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Shakson Belthissor vs. State of Kerala & another
Shoraj Singh Ahlawat & others vs. State of U.P. & another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.