SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Parul Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Anil Prakash – Respondent
ORDER
1. This is a tenant's Writ Petition, which has been preferred, by invoking Article 227 of the Constitution of India, as against the concurrent judgments, which has been rendered by both the Courts below in a proceedings, which were held under Section 21 (1) (a) of Act No. 13 of 1972, and as a consequence thereto, the release application, which was preferred by the respondents/landlord, seeking release of the tenement, in question, which happens to be a residential accommodation, has been allowed, and the petitioner/tenant, has been directed to vacate the premises and to hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of it, to the respondents/landlord, within 30 days from the date of the judgment of the Prescribed Authority.
2. Though this Court should have avoided to make this remark, but owning to the deliberate and intentional, modus operandi, which is normally adopted, which has now, become a regular feature, almost in most of the cases, which are filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is constraint to make certain observations, which has been invariably found, to be followed by the learned Counsel, basically intended so as to mislead the Court or to avoid
Kishan Chand vs. Jagdish Prasad and others 2003 (9) SCC 151
Pramod Kumar Verma vs. VIth Additional District Judge
Bega Begum and others vs. Abdu1 Ahad Khan and others. AIR 1979 SC 272
Shiv Sarup Gupta vs. Dr. Mahesh Chand Gupta. AIR 1999 SC 2507
Suresh Prasad vs. Addl. District Judge Gorakhpur and others
Nellikkottu Kolleriyil Madhavi vs. Kavakkalathil Kalikutty and others
Habib-Ul-Rahman vs. 1st Additional District Judge
Ranjit Singh vs. Ravi Prakash 2004 (3) SCC 682
Surya Dev Rai vs. Ram Chander Rai and others
G. Saraswati and another vs. Rathinammal and others. 2018 (3) SCC 340
C. Venkata Swamy vs. H.N. Shivanna. 2018 (1) SCC 604
B.V. Nagesh and another vs. S.V. Sreenivasa Murthy. 2010 (13) SCC 530
Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs. Mamta and others
Madhukar and others vs. Sangram and others. 2001 (4) SCC 756
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.