UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Hon’ble Chief Justice Mr. Raghvendra Singh Chauhan and
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Verma
Appeal from Order No. 134 of 2021
SMT. REKHA NEGI & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SMT. DIMPLE NEGI & ORS. – Respondent
Decided on : 26.07.2021
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order VII, Rules 10 and 10-A – Application under – Filed by defendants – Wherein they claimed that suit was neither between the parties married to each other, nor between any property involving parties who are/were married to each other – Suit was not filed for declaration of a matrimonial status – Suit not maintainable – Family Court dismissed the application – Concluded that suit is indeed, maintainable under Section 7 of Family Court Act – Hence present appeal before High Court – Dispute between parties is purely a civil dispute and has no bearing or any dispute within a family – Which needs to be resolved by a special procedure as provided under Family Court Act – No any merit in this appeal – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 6, 16 and 17)
flfoy izfØ;k lafgrk] 1908] vkns’k VII, fu;e 10 o 10-A & ds v/khu izkFkZuki= & izfroknhx.k }kjk nkf[ky & ftlesa mUgksaus ;g nkok fd;k fd okn u rks ,d nwljs ls fookfgr i{kdkjksa ds e/; Fkk vkSj u gh lEifÙk ls vUrfoZ”V ,sls fdUgha i{kdkjksa ds e/; Fkk tks ,d&nwljs ls fookfgr Fks & okn oSokfgd fLFkfr dh mn~~?kks”k.kk gsrq nkf[ky ugha fd;k x;k Fkk & okn iks”k.kh; ugha & ifjokj U;k;ky; us mDr izkFkZuki= [kkfjt fd;k & ;g fu”d”kZ fd;k fd okn okLro esa ifjokj U;k;ky; vfèkfu;e dh /kkjk 7 ds v/khu iks”k.kh; gS & vr% mPp U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr vihy & i{kdkjksa ds e/; fookn ‘kq) :i ls ,d flfoy fookn gS vkSj mldk ifjokj esa dksbZ izHkko ugha gS & ftldks fd fdlh fo’ks”k izfØ;k] tSls fd ifjokj U;k;ky; vf/kfu;e ds v/khu micaf/kr gS] ds }kjk lqy>k;s tkus dh vko’;drk gS & bl vihy esa dksbZ xq.k&nks”k ugha & vihy [kkfjtA ¼izLrj 6] 16 o 17½
JUDGMENT
(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
Aggrieved by the order dated 06.07.2021, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun in Original Suit No.456 of 2021, whereby the learned Family Court has dismissed their application under Order VII Rule 10 & 10-A of C.P.C., the defendants-appellants are before this Court in the present appeal.
2. Briefly, the facts of the case are, that the plaintiffs respondents, Smt. Dimple Negi, and Km. Pari Negi, had filed a civil suit before the Family Court for seeking a declaration that the plaintiffs are the legal heirs of Late Mr. Vishamber Singh, that they have right and interest in the movable and immovable properties of Mr. Vishamber Singh after his death. They had also sought a declaration that they are entitled to the death benefits which would be released by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (for short “the ONGC"), defendant No.4. They had further sought a permanent injunction in their favour against defendant Nos.1 to 3, who according to the plaintiffs were the first wife of Late Mr. Vishamber Singh, and his two children from the first wife.
3. According to plaintiff No.1, she met Mr. Vishamber Singh through Facebook. They fell in love with each other. Heinformed her that his first wife had expired, and his two children were staying with their grandparents. Therefore, he is looking for a companion for himself. The plaintiff No.1, and Mr. Vishamber Singh got married on 15.10.2016 at Gurudwara Shri Guru Singh Sabha, situated at Mahinder Park, Delhi. At the time of marriage, while the plaintiff No.1 was residing in Delhi, Mr. Vishamber Singh was residing in Dehradun, and working with the ONGC. After the marriage, Mr. Vishamber Singh brought the plaintiff No.1 to his house situated at Yamnotri Enclave Store, Phase-II, Chanderbani Road, near Kothari General Store, Dehradun. During the marriage, on 19.09.2018, the plaintiff No.1, and Mr. Vishamber Singh were blessed with a daughter. A few years after their marriage, and after the birth of their daughter, Mr. Vishamber Singh informed the plaintiff No.1 that he had lied about his first wife (defendant No.1 in the Civil Suit). It is not that she had died, but he had taken divorce from her. He further informed the plaintiff No.1 that he had already settled the permanent alimony with his first wife. During the COVID- 19 pandemic, unfortunately, Mr. Vishamber Singh died on 12.05.2021. After his death, the plaintiffs approached the ONGC for completing the formalities pertaining to the death benefits. However, the plaintiff No.1 was shocked to know that the name of Mr. Vishamber Singh's first wife, i.e. thename of the defendant No.1, Smt. Rekha Negi, continued to be recorded in the official record of the ONGC.
4. The plaintiff No.1 further claimed that, immediately, after the death of Mr. Vishamber Singh, on 26.05.2021, the defendant Nos.1 and 2 came to her house, and told her to immediately vacate the house, failing which she would face dire consequences. Moreover, subsequently, on 27.05.2021, she has learnt that the defendant No.1 is planning to sell the house. When she questioned the defendant Nos.1 and 2 as to why they are planning to sell the house, she was again threatened by defendant No.2. Consequently, in order to save her life and property, the plaintiff filed a complaint before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun. But, so far, no action has been taken by the police.
5. The plaintiff further claimed that on 30.05.2021, defendant Nos.1 and 2 came with anti-social people, and forcefully tried to evict the plaintiffs from the ground floor of her house. Further, their illegally entered the first floor of the said property. Ever since then, the defendants Nos.1 to 3 are staying on the first floor. They continued to threaten the plaintiff. Therefore, the plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs filed an application for temporary inj
Family Court lacks jurisdiction over third-party claims regarding marital status; remedies must be sought in civil courts.
The jurisdiction of civil courts is limited where a Family Court has been established, barring civil suits concerning marital status declarations.
An ex-parte injunction order can be justified in urgent situations to prevent potential third party rights and multiplicity of litigation.
Disputes regarding marital status and property rights of deceased spouses must be adjudicated in Family Court, as per Family Courts Act, ousting Civil Court jurisdiction.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Family Court does not have inherent jurisdiction under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act to entertain a suit by the wife against the husb....
(1)Jurisdiction of Family Court – Suit seeking declaration of marital status whether it affirms or denies existence of a valid marriage squarely falls within ambit of Family Court’s jurisdiction.(2) ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.