B. P. ROUTRAY, CHITTARANJAN DASH
Sandhya Rani Sahoo @ Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
Anusaya Mohanty – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chittaranjan Dash, J.—By means of this appeal, the Appellant has challenged the judgment dated 12.12.2023 passed by the Learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar, in C.P. No. 576/2017, declaring the Respondent as the legally wedded wife of Late Kailash Chandra Mohanty and his legal heir, thereby entitling her to inherit his ancestral and self-acquired property.
2. The background facts of the case are that the Respondent, Anusaya Mohanty, initiated C.P. No. 576 of 2017 before the Family Court, Bhubaneswar, seeking a declaration that she is the legally wedded wife of Late Kailash Chandra Mohanty and his rightful legal heir. The Respondent claimed that their marriage took place on 05.06.1966 as per Hindu rites and customs, and they lived together, raising two sons. She further alleged that the Appellant, Sandhya Rani Sahoo @ Mohanty, was merely a nurse who worked with the deceased and had no legitimate marital relationship with him. The Family Court decreed the suit on 29.10.2021, declaring the Respondent as the legally wedded wife and legal heir of Late Kailash Chandra Mohanty, entitling her to inherit his ancestral and self-acquired property. Aggrieved by the judgment, the A
Samar Kumar Roy vs. Jharna Bera
RenubalaMoharana and Anr. vs. Mina Mohanty and Ors.
Hanamanthappa and Anr vs. Chandrashekharappa and Ors.
Sri Amar Chand Inani vs. The Union of India
Oil and Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. vs. Modern Construction and Company
(1)Jurisdiction of Family Court – Suit seeking declaration of marital status whether it affirms or denies existence of a valid marriage squarely falls within ambit of Family Court’s jurisdiction.(2) ....
A child born from a void marriage is legitimate under Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and limitation does not bar claims for declaration of rights over ancestral property.
A Family Court has exclusive jurisdiction to declare marital status under the Family Courts Act, rendering such suits filed in civil courts non-maintainable.
(1) No one should be vexed twice for same cause of action. Cause of action must be same for application of Order II Rule 2 of CPC.(2) Concept of Order II Rule 2 of CPC is alien to Family Court procee....
Family Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over marital status declarations and property disputes related to marriage, as established by the Family Courts Act, 1984.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, Order 1 Rule 9 and Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code, and the ....
The Family Courts possess exclusive jurisdiction to declare matrimonial status, rendering suits maintainable even post the husband's death, affirming marriage validity standards under applicable Hind....
The jurisdiction of civil courts is limited where a Family Court has been established, barring civil suits concerning marital status declarations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.