SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(UK) 799

S.K.MISHRA
NEENA KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sri S.K.Mishra, J.

1. Heard Shri Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the petitioners and Shri Sagar Kothari, Advocate for the respondent.

2. Petitioners, being the plaintiffs in Original Suit No. 260 of 2016, have assailed the order dated 28.09.2019 passed by 8th Addl. District Judge, Dehradun in Civil Revision No. 73 of 2019 setting aside the order passed by 3rd Addl. Civil Judge (SD), Dehradun rejecting the application for amendment in the counter claim filed by the defendant – respondent, herein.

3. The facts of the case are as follows: the plaintiffs – petitioners, herein, instituted an Original Suit No. 260 of 2016 before the learned Civil Judge (SD), Dehradun seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant – respondent, herein. Plaintiffs claimed that suit land was bequest to them by Shri Amarnath Kohli by virtue of registered WILL dated 28.08.2006 and he died on 19.06.2012. It is further alleged that the plaintiffs are in possession of the property. One day, defendant and his associates came to the property and created disturbance and threatened them to vacate the property. On 13.05.2016, the defendant after putting his appearance in the case, filed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top