IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, J.
Sajid Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 673 of 2022
Decided on : 19-09-2022
Certiorari - Inclusion in Electoral Roll - Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj Act, 2016 - Section 3, Section 4, Section 9
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought inclusion in the electoral rolls of Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur, Tehsil Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. The dispute arose due to the relocation of the petitioner's family after a flood and subsequent attempts to include their names in the electoral rolls.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, being a resident of Village Mandawar, should be included in the electoral rolls of Village Mandawar Gram Panchayat. The court dismissed the writ petition as it found no patent error committed by the authorities.
Issues: The main issue was the inclusion of the petitioner and similarly situated persons in the electoral rolls of Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur, Tehsil Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that as per the Uttarakhand Panchayati Raj Act, a person can be a member of the Gram Sabha and the Gram Panchayat if they are 18 years old and residing within the jurisdiction of the Gram Panchayat. The court emphasized the importance of residency and inclusion in the electoral rolls of the respective Gram Panchayat.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner should be included in the electoral rolls of Village Mandawar Gram Panchayat and found no merit in the petition.
JUDGMENT :
1. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
i. Issue a writ of Certiorari to call for the record of the case and quash the order dated 22.02.2022 passed by the respondent no. 1, contained in Annexure 1 to the writ petition.
ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents’ authorities to include the name of the petitioner and other similarly situated persons in the electoral roll of Village Chauli Sahabuddinpur, Tehsil – Bhagwanpur, District – Haridwar so that they may participate and cast their votes in the forthcoming election of Gram Panchayat in District Haridwar.
2. The petitioner’s forefathers were residing in Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur, Tehsil - Bhagwanpur, District – Haridwar. In the year 1960, there was a flash flood in river Sonali, as a result of which, a substantial portion of the land of the said village was washed away. The District Administration in order to re-settle the families, who had lost their houses and homestead, requisitioned 36 Bigha land within the Revenue Village of Mandawar, which is adjoining to the Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur. The petitioner and his ancestors were residing there since then. It is the case of the petitioner that he and his forefathers were casting their vote as members of Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur Gram Sabha and listed as voters in the electoral rolls of the aforesaid Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur Gram Panchayat till 2015.
3. In the last Panchayat election held in the year 2015, the wife of respondent no. 6 contested the election of Gram Pradhan of Gram Sabha, Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur, District - Haridwar. However, she did not succeed in the election. Thereafter, she filed an application before the learned District Magistrate, Haridwar on 08.07.2015 to correct the voter list of Village Chauli Sahbuddinpur and to delete the names of the persons, who are residing in Khasra Nos. 426, 428, 429, 430, 444, 445, 446 and 447 and include their names in the voter list of Village Mandawar. No order was passed by the learned District Magistrate on her application dated 08.07.2015. Thereafter, one Yusuf Ali, who is signatory to the representation dated 08.07.2015, filed a writ petition before this Court bearing WPMS No. 2941 of 2015 for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. This Court disposed of the same vide judgment and order dated 26.11.2015 and directed the learned District Magistrate to consider the representation within four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
4. In compliance of direction of this Court, the learned District Magistrate, Haridwar called a report from the learned Additional District Magistrate, who submitted the same on 19.12.2015 and after considering the report as well as the other facts, the learned Additional District Magistrate rejected the claim of the petitioner in that writ petition on 19.12.2015. The said order was adopted by the learned District Magistrate and on the basis of the report of the learned Additional District Magistrate rejected the claim of the petitioner. Then, Yusuf Ali challenged the order dated 19.12.2015 by filing another writ petition bearing WPMS No. 1139 of 2016 before this Court.
5. At the same time on 22.08.2017, a representation was moved by Irfan and Mehandi Hasan before the Chief Minister for deleting the names of these persons, who are residing in the aforementioned Khasra of Village Mandawar, over which, a letter was written by the Government of Uttarakhand to the Secretary, State Election Commission, Uttarakhand dated 22.09.2017 to take further action in the matter. Upon receipt of the representation, the Secretary of State Election Commission, Uttarakhand was moved for taking appropriate action on the matter on the basis of the aforesaid communication. The State Election Commission vide its order dated 16.12.2017 directed the learned District Magistrate, Haridwar, who happens to be the District Electoral Officer
Residency and inclusion in electoral rolls of the respective Gram Panchayat are essential for membership in the Gram Sabha and the Gram Panchayat.
The finality of the electoral roll and the inability to challenge its validity in an election petition.
The definition of 'ordinarily resident' under the Punjab State Election Commission Act requires actual residency, not just property ownership, for voter registration.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that if objections were invited, raised, and rejected by the relevant authority, the court cannot entertain the challenge to the delimitation of Pa....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of the Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, specifically Sections 9, 10, and 13, govern the elections, qualifications, and disqualifica....
Point of Law : Section 11B of the Act provides for election of Pradhan. Section 11D of the Act makes certain further prohibitions in respect of the persons who are seeking election as a Pradhan.
Once a notification for an election program has been issued, no amendment, inclusion, or deletion of names in the electoral rolls can be permitted, as elections must proceed based on the extant elect....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.