JUDGMENT :

Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

This is plaintiff’s revision, which stood admitted by this Court by an order dated 14th June 2022.

2. Learned counsels for the parties, have consented upon that they don’t have any objection, in case, if the revision itself is considered by this Court, on its own merit at this stage.

3. In view of the aforesaid consensus, yesterday the Counsels were heard at length, and the matter was spread over to be continued to be argued today.

4. The plaintiff to the present civil revision preferred under section 115 of the CPC, had put a challenge to the impugned order dated 12th April 2022, as it has been passed by the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haridwar, in Original Suit No.274 of 2019, “Sangeeta Khanna & others Vs. Rambharat”, whereby the plaintiff’s application being paper No.88(c) 2, which was said to have been preferred under Order 18 Rule 3A of the CPC, has been rejected.

5. The learned counsel for the revisionist, had put a challenge to the impugned order of rejection of his application paper no.88(c) (2); on the ground that the basic purpose and intention of the legislative amendment carried, with effect from 1st July 1977, resulting into an