SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA
Haneef Malik – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This C-482 Application is being pressed by the present applicant on a very short premise with regard to the manner in which the cognizance have been taken by the learned Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, district Udham Singh Nagar, in Criminal Case No. 7353 of 2018, State Vs. Haneef Malik, whereby the present applicant has been summoned to be tried, for his alleged involvement in commission of the offences under Section 3/4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. The solitary argument, which has been extended by the learned counsel for the applicant is, that the summoning order, which is on a format, is without an application of mind nor the same is reflected from the order itself that the Court prior to passing of the summoning had applied its rational, based on material before it.
2. Brief facts of the case are, that an FIR, being FIR No. 446 dated 20.12.2017, was got registered by the complainant Jagdhish Dhakriyal, for the alleged involvement of the named accused person i.e. the present applicant herein, for his alleged involvement in commission of the offence under Section 3/4 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) A
Bhushan Kumar and Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
Bhushan Kumar Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
GHCL Employees Stock Option Trust Vs. India Infoline Ltd.
M/s.Thermax Ltd. & Ors. vs. K.M. Johny & Ors.
Pepsi Foods Ltd. and Another Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Others, 1998 (5) SCC 749
S.K. Sinha, Chief Enforcement Officer v. Videocon International Ltd. and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.