SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Vikas Kathait – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Alok Kumar Verma, J.)
1. The present Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 31.10.2013, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rishikesh, District Dehradun in Sessions Trial No.178 of 2006, “State vs. Vikas Kathait”, by which, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs.60,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short, “IPC”), and, he has been further convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years along with a fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 201 read with Section 34 IPC.
2. Briefly stated the prosecution case as it emerges from re-appreciation of the evidence on record is that on 04.08.2006, one Shiv Prasad Singh (PW1) informed the Police Chowki I.D.P.L. through telephone no.2454100 that opposite to Gali No.5, nearby the railway track, a dead body of an unknown person is lying, which is in nude condition and headless. On the said information, Sub-Inspector Sheeshpal (PW17) along with Head Constable Dalbir Singh, Constable Vijay Kumar and Co
C. Chenga Reddy vs. State of A.P.
Trimukh Maroti Kirkan vs. State of Maharashtra
Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Sunil Clifford Daniel vs. State of Punjab
The judgment establishes the importance of conclusive and credible evidence in criminal cases, the admissibility of confession, the need to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the principle that....
The judgment establishes the principle that in cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must present complete and conclusive evidence to establish guilt beyond all reasonable doubt. It....
The court emphasized that in criminal cases, mere suspicion cannot substitute for proof, and a complete chain of circumstantial evidence is essential for conviction.
The sufficiency of circumstantial evidence and the need for a complete chain of evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must establish a complete chain of circumstances and motive in murder cases; failure to do so warrants acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.