SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 20

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Shah Aalam – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sachin, Advocate, Lalit Miglani, Advocate, Dinesh Chauhan, Advocate, Mamta Joshi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicants-Shah Aalam, Shamim Ahmad @ Paatu and Mohammad Rafi are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.141 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 352, 452, 325, 323 & 307 IPC, Police Station Gadarpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. They have sought their release on bail.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is argued that the co-accused having similar role have already been granted bail by this Court. It is a case of parity.

4. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail. Accordingly, the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top