IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Alok Kumar Verma, J.
Deepak Bhatt - Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 3482 of 2018
Decided On : 09-01-2023
Arbitrary and Illegal - Conditions of Service of Public Servant - The court disposed of the writ petition and directed the matter to be adjudicated by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to declare the action of the respondents as arbitrary and illegal, and to quash the impugned communication/letter and to promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) with consequential benefits.
Finding of the Court:
The court, with the consent of both parties, directed the complete record along with the writ petition to be transmitted to the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal for adjudication as a claim petition.
Issues: The issues involved the conditions of service of a public servant and the appropriate forum for adjudication of the disputes raised in the writ petition.
Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the disputes raised in the writ petition could be effectively adjudicated by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal, and therefore directed the matter to be heard by the Tribunal.
Final Decision: The Writ Petition was disposed of and the matter was directed to be adjudicated by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
JUDGMENT
Alok Kumar Verma, J. - The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following reliefs:-
(i) To declare the action of the respondents, particularly respondent no.3, in the matter as arbitrary and illegal.
(ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned communication/letter dated 17.09.2018, issued by the respondent no.3 (Annexure No.6 to the writ petition) in so far as it relates to the petitioner i.e. Para 6(iii).
(iii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and promote the petitioner to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) form due date i.e. from the date when the persons junior to him, promoted to the said post, under Degree holder quota, and also to grant all consequential benefits to him.
2. Heard Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C., Mr. Sushil Vashisth, learned Standing Counsel & Mr. S.M.S. Mehta, learned Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.
3. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State, submitted that the present matter relates to the conditions of service of a public servant, therefore, the petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy to raise his grievances before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
4. Mr. Bhagwat Mehra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, agrees to transfer the present matter to the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
5. As the disputes raised in the present writ petition can be effectively adjudicated by the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal, with the consent of both the parties, the complete record along with the writ petition, after retaining the copies thereof, is being transmitted to the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal for hearing the writ petition as a claim petition in accordance with law.
6. The Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal is also requested to consider entertaining the present matter as a claim petition taking into consideration this fact that the present matter has been pending for past four years.
7. The present Writ Petition (S/S No.3482 of 2018) stands disposed of accordingly.
The court has the discretion to direct the adjudication of a matter by an appropriate forum, especially when it involves the conditions of service of a public servant.
The court's decision was influenced by the principle that disputes related to the conditions of service of a public servant can be effectively adjudicated by the appropriate tribunal, and thus direct....
The court's decision was based on the principle that disputes related to the conditions of service of public servants could be effectively adjudicated by the appropriate tribunal, and therefore direc....
The court's decision was influenced by the nature of the dispute related to the conditions of service of public servants and the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy.
The court emphasized the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal for grievances related to the conditions of service of public servants.
The court emphasized the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal for adjudication of disputes related to the conditions of service of public se....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy for public servants to raise grievances before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal.
The court emphasized the availability of an alternate efficacious remedy before the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal for adjudicating the grievances raised in the writ petition.
The court's decision was influenced by the principle that disputes related to the conditions of service of public servants should be effectively adjudicated by the appropriate tribunal, in this case,....
The jurisdiction of the court to decide on the reliefs sought by a public servant and the eligibility for promotion based on ACRs and withheld increments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.