SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(UK) 270

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Ravindra Maithani, JJ.
Prabhagiya Vipnan Prabandhak Uttarakhand Forest Development Ramnagar - Revisionist
Versus
Commissioner Commercial Tax Uttarakhand, Dehradun – Respondent
Commercial Tax Revision No. 44 & 45 of 2022, Commercial Tax Revision No. 23 of 2013 (Decided Revision)
Decided On : 11-07-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Revisionist : Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, learned counsel
For the Respondent:Mr. J.P. Joshi, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Mohit Maulekhi and Ms. Puja Banga

The main legal point established in the judgment is that Mandi Shulk levied under Section 17(iii)(b) of the Adhiniyam falls within the definition of the expression 'sale price' as defined in Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act and should be treated as a part of the sale price of the goods.

Headnote:

Mandi Fees - Interpretation of Sale Price - Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act - Section 2(42)

Fact of the Case:

The court considered whether Mandi Fees charged by the Mandi could be treated as a part of sale price under Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act. The Division Bench held that the sale price shall not include Mandi Shulk that is collected by the Nigam and deposited with the funds of the Committee, while the learned Single Judge held that Mandi Shulk formed part of 'sale price' under Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that Mandi Shulk levied under Section 17(iii)(b) of the Adhiniyam would fall within the definition of the expression 'sale price' as defined in Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, and would be treated as a part of the sale price of the goods. The decision of the Division Bench in CTR No.23 of 2013 was overruled, and the decision of the learned Single Judge in M/s Ashok Kumar (supra) was upheld as laying down the correct position in law.

Issues: The main issue was the interpretation of 'sale price' under Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act and whether Mandi Shulk should be included in the sale price.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that Mandi Shulk levied under Section 17(iii)(b) of the Adhiniyam falls within the definition of the expression 'sale price' as defined in Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand VAT Act and should be treated as a part of the sale price of the goods.

Final Decision: The revisions were dismissed, and the decision of the Division Bench in CTR No.23 of 2013 was overruled. The decision of the learned Single Judge in M/s Ashok Kumar (supra) was upheld as laying down the correct position in law.

JUDGMENT :

Vipin Sanghi, J.

1. This reference has been made to the Larger Bench by the Division Bench vide order dated 21.04.2023. Insofar as, it is relevant, the order of reference reads as follows :-

    “4. The question of law which arises for consideration in the present revision is whether Mandi Fees charged by the Mandi could be treated as a part of sale price under Section 2(42) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act.

5. The revisionist places reliance on a judgment rendered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Commercial Tax Revision No.23 of 2013, dated 22.04.2022. The Coordinate Bench has held in Paragraph Nos.14 to 16 of the said judgment as follows:-

“14. Looking from another angle, the term ‘sale price’ has been defined under Sub-Section 42 of Section 2 of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005. It reads as follows:-

(42) "Sale Price" means the amount of valuable consideration received or receivable by a dealer for sale of any goods and shall include any sum charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of goods at the time or before the delivery thereof, excise duty, special excise duty or any other duty or tax but shall not include-

(a) any sum allowed by the seller of goods to the purchaser as cash discount, commission or trade discount according to normal trade practice, at the time of sale of goods;

(b) the cost of outward freight or delivery or the cost of installation in cases where such cost is separately charged;

(c) the amount of tax under this Act, if separately charged by the dealer;

Explanation.-For the purpose of this sub-section "Sale Price" includes;-

(a) in relation to the delivery of goods on hire purchase or any other system of payment by installments, the total amount of valuable consideration including deposit or other initial payment in order to complete the purchase or the acquisition of the property in goods. It includes hire charges, interest and other charges incidental to such transaction, but does not include any sum payable as penalty or as compensation or damages for breach of agreement;

(b) in relation to transfer of the right to use any goods for any purpose (whether or not for a specified period) the valuable consideration or hire charges received or receivable for such transfer of right to use goods but does not include any sum payable as a penalty or as compensation or damages for breach of agreement;

(c) in relation to the transfer of property in goods (whether as goods or in some other form) involved in the execution of works contract, the valuable consideration paid or payable to a person for the execution of such works contract, less the actual amount representing labour and such other charges as may be prescribed, but does not include any sum payable as a penalty or as compensation or damages for breach of agreement;

(d) the amount of duties paid or payable under Central Excise Act, 1944, or Customs Act, 1962, or U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as applicable in Uttarakhand, in respect of such goods at the time of clearance of the goods from bonded warehouse, whether such duties are paid or payable by or on behalf of the seller or by any other person;

(e) the price of packing material in which goods sold are packed;

15. Thus, it is clear though specifically there is no mention that market fees will be excluded from the sale price, it is apparent that the following sums are included in the sale price:

(i) the sum charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of goods at the time or before the delivery thereof;

(ii) excise duty;

(iii) special excise duty or any other duty or tax but shall not include:

(a) any sum allowed by the seller of goods to the purchaser as cash discount, commission or trade discount according to normal trade practice, at the time of sale of goods;

(b) the cost of outward freight or delivery or the cost of installation in cases where such cost is separately charged; and

(c) the amount of tax under the Act, if separately charged by the dealer.

16. Thus, it is clear that any sums that are

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top