VIPIN SANGHI, MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Prabhagiya Vipnan Prabandhak Uttarakhand Forest Development Ramnagar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Commercial Tax Uttarakhand, Dehradun – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vipin Sanghi, J.
1. This reference has been made to the Larger Bench by the Division Bench vide order dated 21.04.2023. Insofar as, it is relevant, the order of reference reads as follows :-
5. The revisionist places reliance on a judgment rendered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Commercial Tax Revision No.23 of 2013, dated 22.04.2022. The Coordinate Bench has held in Paragraph Nos.14 to 16 of the said judgment as follows:-
“14. Looking from another angle, the term ‘sale price’ has been defined under Sub-Section 42 of Section 2 of the Uttarakhand VAT Act, 2005. It reads as follows:-
(42) "Sale Price" means the amount of valuable consideration received or receivable by a dealer for sale of any goods and shall include any sum charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of goods at the time or before the delivery thereof, excise duty, special excise duty or any other duty or tax but shall not include-
(a) any sum allowed by the seller of goods to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.