IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Vipin Sanghi, J.
Shri Jagdish Bhatia - Appellant
Vs.
Smt. Parvati Devi and others - Respondents
Arbitration Petition No. 56 Of 2022
Decided On : 27-04-2023
Arbitration - Partnership Dispute - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11(6) - Section 9 - Dissolution of Partnership - Limitation Act, 1963 - NTPC Ltd. vs. M/s SPML Infra Ltd.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant filed an Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a partnership deed. The respondent claimed that the partnership firm stood dissolved in 2011 and the claims were barred by limitation.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the partnership firm was dissolved in 2011 and the claims for arbitration were beyond the period of limitation. The court also held that an Agreement entered into in 2019 did not contain an Arbitration Agreement and disputes arising from it cannot be referred to arbitration.
Issues: Partnership dissolution, acknowledgment of dissolution notice, limitation period for arbitration claims, and arbitrability of disputes arising from an Agreement.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the partnership firm was dissolved in 2011, and the claims for arbitration were time-barred. It also ruled that disputes arising from the 2019 Agreement cannot be referred to arbitration as it did not contain an Arbitration Agreement.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
JUDGMENT :
The applicant has preferred the present Application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) to seek appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2. The case of the applicant is that the applicant entered into a partnership deed dated 01.10.1981 to carry on the business under the name and style of “M/s Bhatia Enterprises”, along with several other partners. He further states that the said Firm was reconstituted on 01.11.1999 upon retirement of one of the partners, namely Sri Suraj Prakash Bhatia. The applicant states that upon reconstitution, there were several partners in the partnership firm, wherein the applicant has 4% share. The applicant narrates that the records of the Firm were being maintained by Sri Kishan Lal Bhatia. Upon his demise, the records were taken into custody by respondent No. 5-Sri Chander Prakash Bhatia. He further states that upon demise of the existing partners, their legal representatives became partners of the Firm. The applicant narrates that several proceedings under Section 9 of the Act were initiated by one or the other parties. He further states that in the year 2019, it was decided between the partners of the Firm and their heirs that the construction standing over the property of the Firm be demolished and the property be divided as per the percentage of the shares. The applicant has placed on record the Agreement executed between the parties in that regard.
3. In Paragraph-12 of the Application, it is stated that dissolution of the Firm has not taken place. He further states that Sri Jitendra Bhatia has not made available the Books of Account for inspection, despite the applicant’s demands. He further states that the applicant’s demand for partition of the property in respective shares was not agreed to by the respondents. It is further claimed that respondent No. 5 has sought to deal with the property of the partnership firm in September, 2021. Clause 27 of the Partnership Deed contains the Arbitration Agreement. The applicant states that disputes and differences have arisen between the parties under the Partnership Deed, which need to be resolved through arbitration.
4. Notices have been exchanged between the parties, which have been referred to in the Application.
5. Upon filing of this Application, notices were issued to the respondents. A reply has been filed on behalf of respondent No. 4; a composite reply has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 & 15, and; another reply has been filed on behalf of respondent Nos. 3, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14.
6. The stand taken by the respondents is that the aforesaid Partnership Firm stood dissolved in the year 2011 with the issuance of a notice for dissolution which was issued by Sri Jeet Ram Bhatia, one of the partners of the Firm, on 21.01.2011. In the said notice, which was addressed to the existing partners, including the applicant Sri Jagdish Chand Bhatia, Sri Jeet Ram Bhatia expressly conveyed his intention of dissolving the Firm w.e.f 21.01.2011. He also stated that “You are aware that the business of the firm stands closed w.e.f. 20.01.2011.”
7. The applicant responded to the said notice, through registered AD post, and the response of the applicant-Jagdish Chand Bhatia has also been placed on record, which reads as follows:-
Sir,
Shri Jeet Ram Bhatia,
S/o Late Shri Rikhi Ram Bhatia,
R/o 124/5, Rajendra Nagar, Street No. 4, Kaulagarh Road,
Dehradun.
Kindly refer to your letter dated 21/01/2011. In context of the above notice we have to state the following facts: -
1. That your letter is without any basis and is an attempt on your part to avoid payment of legitimate dues to us. You are withholding the accounts and funds of the firm.
2. That the letter has been issued by you only to evade payment of the legitimate dues of the partners and to coerce us to forego our rights.
3. I have also learnt that you have filed an application under Secti
Partnership dissolution and limitation period for arbitration claims.
The court held that an arbitrator can be appointed to resolve disputes within a partnership agreement, including dissolution matters, provided the application is timely and properly invoked.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the dispute amongst the partners regarding the dealings of the firm could be referred to arbitration as per the partnership deed, but once the....
The arbitration clause survives the dissolution of a partnership firm and can be invoked by any partner, including legal representatives, to resolve disputes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.